Motion tolerance in wearable OPM-MEG using dynamic field nulling
Jas, M.; Matsubara, T.; Stufflebeam, S. M.; Sundaram, P.; Ahlfors, S. P.
Show abstract
Wearable magnetoencephalography (MEG) enabled by optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) promises improved comfort and motion tolerance. This is particularly beneficial when measuring brain activity in children who cannot sit still for long periods of time. Compared to cryogenic MEG, wearable MEG allows larger head movements, but they result in artifacts due to uncompensated background fields and reduce source localization accuracy. Spatial filtering methods can partially compensate these motion-induced artifacts, but they are most effective when used in combination with background field nulling. This is because accurate spatial filtering relies on an accurate estimate of the sensor gain and orientation of its sensitive axis. Through simulations, we first deduce the target residual background field that is necessary for accurate dipole localization (< 1 cm) in the presence of head movements. Using our open-source printed circuit board (PCB) coils, we develop a method to dynamically null the background field. We demonstrate that our dynamic field nulling method allows improved localization of somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) by maintaining the background field below the target residual fields established in the simulations. Our study highlights the importance of tracking both the background field and the head position relative to the background field for quality assurance in wearable MEG.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Simulation Study on High Spatio-Temporal Resolution Acousto-Electrophysiological Neuroimaging 93%
- Effective correction of extreme capacitive artifacts in TMS-EEG via windowed detrending 92%
- Measuring Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Electric Fields in Anatomically and Conductively Accurate Rat Head Phantoms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.