Exposure to unhealthy commodity brands in YouTube highlights of English Premier League and FIFA World Cup football matches

Background YouTube highlights packages are a major and growing route to football consumption, particularly among children and young people, but brand exposure within them has not been quantified. We measured unhealthy commodity brand exposure in English Premier League (EPL) and FIFA World Cup (WC) highlights. Methods We coded brand appearances lasting two or more seconds in 10 Sky Sports EPL highlights (final 10 games of the 2025/26 season) and 19 official FIFA 2026 WC highlights, recording commodity category, placement, and match moment, alongside pre-roll YouTube adverts. Data were collected between 4 June and 27 July 2026. Five highlights were double-coded (Cohen's kappa 0.85). Results Overall brand density was similar across competitions (13.1 vs 13.9 references per minute), but composition differed markedly. Unhealthy commodity branding occupied 38.0% of EPL screen time versus 18.7% at the WC, a difference driven almost entirely by gambling (32.6% vs 1.5%). Gambling appeared in every EPL package, mainly on pitchside boards and LED screens (50.4%), with front-of-shirt accounting for 27.1%. WC exposure was more evenly spread across HFSS food (13%), alcohol (4%) and trading/crypto/prediction markets (3.7%), and appeared almost exclusively pitchside. Gambling brands accounted for ten of twelve pre-roll EPL adverts (123 of 153 seconds); no gambling adverts preceded WC highlights. Conclusions Gambling dominates unhealthy commodity exposure in EPL highlights, both in-video and in pre-roll advertising. Because most appearances occur away from the front of shirt, the voluntary front-of-shirt sponsorship withdrawal will leave the majority of this exposure intact. The WC comparison shows that tighter central control of the advertising environment produces lower and more diffuse exposure, and that governments and governing bodies with such control could restrict unhealthy categories altogether.