Optimising the prevention, detection and management of diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes: Feasibility study protocol (D-stress feasibility study).
Fabian-Therond, C.; Ahuja, S.; Papachristou Nadal, I.; Holt, R. I.; Watson, S. I.; Hussain, S.; Choudhary, P.; Ajjan, R.; Harris, R.; Peck, M.; Mohammadi, J.; Sims, S.; Fiorentino, F.; Due-Christensen, M.; Huber, J.; Fisher, L.; Hardenberg, K.; Stadler, M.; Jin, H.; Halliday, J. A.; Sturt, J.; on behalf of the D-stress study collaborators,
Show abstract
Introduction Diabetes distress describes the psychological and emotional burden of living with diabetes and is associated with reduced self-management and adverse diabetes outcomes. Clinical guidelines recommend routine assessment and management of diabetes distress, but this is not always implemented. Therefore, there is a need to develop approaches to deliver emotional health support in routine clinical care more effectively. We describe here the protocol for a study to I) assess the feasibility of implementation of the D-stress Pathway, comprising Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) and an online, group-based, psychological diabetes distress reduction intervention called REDUCE, ii) evaluate the feasibility of the study protocol iii) detect an effect signal of diabetes distress score and Interstitial Glucose Time in Range and iv) refine initial programme theories of how both interventions (EUC and REDUCE) work, for whom, and under what circumstances. Methods This feasibility study includes a multicentre trial within a cohort design (TWICs) where sites have a staggered exposure to the interventions alongside a realist process evaluation. Four UK NHS diabetes services will recruit 80 adults with type 1 diabetes ([≥]1 year) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) ([≥]3 months). All participants will receive EUC and provide monthly data over 7 months on diabetes distress (measured by the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1DDAS) and interstitial glucose measured by using continuous glucose monitoring. Participants with elevated diabetes distress, will be offered the six-week, group-based, online REDUCE intervention plus EUC, compared to EUC alone. Up to twenty participants with type 1 diabetes, ten family members/friends, sixteen healthcare professionals delivering EUC and five REDUCE facilitators will be interviewed to explore their experience of receiving training and delivering the D-stress Pathway. Up to 20 EUC consultations and REDUCE sessions will be observed. Analysis Feasibility will be assessed against pre-specified progression criteria and analysed descriptively using summary statistics. Primary outcomes include baseline level of diabetes distress, recruitment rate, intervention uptake, and data completeness, which will be analysed descriptively. Qualitative data will be analysed using framework analysis guided by realist programme theories developed for this study. Ethics Ethics approval has been granted by NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC) (Bromley REC: 25/LO/0469) and Health Research Authority obtained. All participants will provide informed consent. Trial registration no: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT07193446 on 26/11/2025. Protocol and statistical analysis plan: The trial protocol and statistical analysis plan can be accessed at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 96%
- A randomised controlled trial of preconception lifestyle intervention on maternal and offspring health in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: study protocol for the BEFORE THE BEGINNING trial 94%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring support needs of people living with diabetes during the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a UK survey 94%
- Nothing About Us Without Us: A Scoping Review and Priority-Setting Partnership in Type 1 Diabetes and Exercise 94%
- Severe COVID-19 and Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Three London Teaching Hospitals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Effect of Prebiotics on the Gut Microbiome Profile and β-cell Function in Youth with Newly-Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 89%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time-restricted eating and exercise training before and during pregnancy for people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: the BEFORE THE BEGINNING randomised controlled trial 93%
- Adherence to the test, trace and isolate system: results from a time series of 21 nationally representative surveys in the UK (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses study) 90%
- Emulating the GRADE Trial Using Real-World Data 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Type 2 diabetes risks and determinants in 2nd generation migrants and mixed ethnicity people of South Asian and African Caribbean descent in the UK 92%
- Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: an overview of the data from the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium 90%
- Replication and cross-validation of T2D subtypes based on clinical variables: an IMI-RHAPSODY study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.