Back

Identification of soil microbes associated with real-time plastic degradation using in situ conductivity sensors

Blakney, A. J. C.; Luna, N.; Dragone, N. B.; Sharpe, T.; Mendez, N.; Speetjens, K.; Garcia, J.; Whiting, G.; Fierer, N.

2026-08-19 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.16.745074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microbial-mediated plastic degradation has the potential to address the persistent global problems of plastic waste and pollution. Previous work has shown that soils can harbour microbes capable of plastic degradation, but we expect there is a broader diversity of soil microbes capable of metabolizing plastics than identified to date using more traditional cultivation-based screening methods. Here we demonstrate a novel approach to identify putative plastic degrading microbes in soil. We paired in situ, real-time measurements of microbial plastic degradation on conductive sensors with subsequent microbial community profiling of the sensor-associated biofilms exhibiting appreciable degradation. To illustrate the utility of our approach, we focus on microbial degradation of the bioplastic polymer PHBV, poly(3-hydroxybutuyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). We screened a range of soils with the in situ sensors to identify a subset of five soils with high PHBV degradation rates, and confirmed that PHBV degradation was due to microbial activity. We then extracted DNA directly from sensors placed in soils with high measured rates of PHBV degradation and used marker gene sequencing to identify the bacterial and fungal taxa associated with the observed PHBV degradation. We confirmed via in vitro culturing that microbes isolated from the sensors have a demonstrated capacity for PHBV metabolism. Together, these results highlight the benefit and feasibility of using low-cost, in-soil sensors to simultaneously collect real-time data on plastic degradation rates in soil and identify previously unrecognized microbial taxa capable of degrading and metabolizing plastic polymers in situ.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.