A generalizable normalization framework to decouple protocol and instrument effects: Application to high-sensitivity proteomics multicentric study (PME13)
Arauz-Garofalo, G.; Ciordia, S.; Gonzalez de Peredo, A.; Chaoui, K.; Rijal, J. B.; Gaxotte, V.; Folch-i-Casanovas, I.; Azkargorta, M.; Almey, R.; Aloria, K.; Kirim, B. A.; Barderas, R.; Braga-Lagache, S.; Calvo, E.; Chicano-Galvez, E.; Clemente, F.; Chiritoiu, G.; Chiva, C.; Decourcelle, M.; Dhaenens, M.; Diaz, R.; Douche, T.; Duran-Cortines, A.; Duran-Ruiz, M. C.; El Koulali, K.; Escobar-Nino, A.; Fernandez Acero, F. J.; Fernandez-Irigoyen, J.; Garcia-Garcia, C.; Gil, C.; Goetze, S.; Gonzalez Vidal, E.; Gutierrez, M.; Hernaez, M. L.; Lopez, C. M.; Marin-Vicente, C.; Mateos-Martin, M. L.; Mato
Show abstract
Multicenter studies are essential for benchmarking analytical workflows, yet their interpretation is often confounded by the combined effects of experimental protocols and instrumentation. To address this challenge, we introduce a simple normalization-based analytical framework, the recovery metric ({rho}), designed to decouple protocol driven effects from instrument dependent variability. We applied this framework to the 13th Proteomics Multicentric Experiment (PME13), a large multicentric proteomics dataset generated across 27 laboratories using high sensitivity workflows and varying sample preparation protocols. By leveraging a common digested reference sample, {rho} enables direct cross-comparison of all datasets on a unified scale, effectively minimizing instrument-related biases. Using this approach, we demonstrate that apparent instrument dependent trends are largely removed when evaluated through {rho}, revealing consistent protocol driven effects across laboratories. Statistical modeling identified key variables influencing {rho}, including sample input amount, reduction and alkylation, and the use of n-dodecyl-{beta}-D-maltoside (DDM). While DDM was associated with improved {rho}, reduction and alkylation and additional handling steps led to reduced performance, particularly at low input levels. We further highlight practical considerations for the application of ratio based normalization, including the occurrence of values exceeding theoretical bounds, which reflect deviations from underlying assumptions and require appropriate filtering. Overall, this work establishes a generalizable analytical strategy for disentangling confounding factors in multicentric datasets and provides practical guidelines for optimizing high sensitivity proteomics (HSP) workflows. The proposed framework is broadly applicable to other analytical fields where cross laboratory comparability is required.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- 2-Mercaptoethanol/DMSO workflow enables highly reproducible quantitative proteomics 97%
- DIA-NN EasyFilter workflow for the fast and user-friendly critical assessment and visualization of DIA-NN proteomics analysis outcome 97%
- Evaluation of a prototype Orbitrap Astral Zoom mass spectrometer for quantitative proteomics - Beyond identification lists 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MS-EmpiRe utilizes peptide-level noise distributions for ultra sensitive detection of differentially abundant proteins 96%
- Fast and accurate bacterial species identification in biological samples using LC-MS/MS mass spectrometry and machine learning 96%
- Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Multiplexed Proteomics Integrate Ion-Statistics with Peptide Quantification Concordance 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.