Air sampling in team congregate spaces for early detection of respiratory virus threats at the 2026 FIFA World Cup™
Simon, D.; Locksmith, T. J.; Minor, N. R.; Emmen, I. E.; Wilson, N. A.; O'Connor, E. J.; O'Connor, S. L.; O'Connor, D. H.
Show abstract
Objective. Respiratory infections are the leading cause of illness at major sporting events, yet surveillance relies on athletes recognising and reporting symptoms. We evaluated whether continuous air sampling with point-of-care molecular testing could detect respiratory-virus nucleic acids in an elite team's congregate spaces during competition, and whether the resulting signals were operationally useful. Methods. We performed a prospective, descriptive environmental-surveillance study following the Canadian men's national soccer team across five host cities during the 2026 FIFA World Cup (3 June to 4 July 2026). InBio Apollo bioaerosol samplers ran continuously in up to four team-designated rooms per hotel (physiotherapy, meal, equipment, and coaches' room or hallway). Filters were changed approximately twice daily, eluted on-site, and tested with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress(R) SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus assay. A sample was considered positive if any cycle-threshold (Ct) value was reported, as less than 45, for a target. Results. Of 174 air filters, there were 13 detections of virus genetic material (9 SARS-CoV-2, 3 influenza A virus, 1 influenza B virus, 0 RSV). Detections were sparse early and clustered late in the tournament. An influenza A signal appeared the morning a player was sent home febrile, and SARS-CoV-2 signals coincided with visibly ill hotel staff, with signals falling after ill staff were excluded. Conclusion. Air sampling with point-of-care testing is feasible in the mobile environment of an elite team and can surface behavior-independent viral signals during competition that may offer opportunities for earlier precautionary actions.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Aerosol tracer testing in Boeing 767 and 777 aircraft to simulate exposure potential of infectious aerosol such as SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Aerosol SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals and long-term care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- The challenge of SARS-CoV-2 environmental monitoring in schools using floors and portable HEPA filtration units: Fresh or relic RNA? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Impact of Non-exhaust Emissions on the Asthmatic Airway (IONA) Protocol for a randomised three exposure crossover study 92%
- Gastroenterology Procedures Generate Aerosols: an Air Quality Turnover Solution to Mitigate the Risk 92%
- Experimental efficacy of the face shield and the mask against emitted and potentially received particles 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating sensitivity of nasal or throat (ISNOT): A combination of both swabs increases sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests 91%
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 90%
- Evaluation of the INDICAID™ COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in symptomatic populations and asymptomatic community testing 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inactivation of Airborne Pathogen Surrogates by Triethylene Glycol 91%
- Catching more air: A method to spatially quantify aerial triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus 91%
- Acinetobacter spp. with lower susceptibility to quaternary ammonium compounds enriched in microbial communities of frequently used sinks 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.