Back

From video-derived feeding behaviour to cow-level nutritional deviation signals: A dairy digital-twin decision-support framework

Rao, S.; Neethirajan, S. R.

2026-08-20 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.14.744981 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Continuous video offers a dynamic view of dairy-cow behaviour, but its value for precision nutrition depends on alignment with physiological context. We developed a dairy digital-twin framework that fuses identity-associated behavioural records from an established video-analytics layer with body weight, milk production, milk fat, parity and days in milk. The 16-cow analytical cohort was monitored for up to 11 days in one tie-stall barn, yielding 153 cow-days after quality exclusions applied before model fitting. NRC (2001) expected dry matter intake provided a transparent physiological reference compatible with the daily records. In matched leave-one-cow-out analysis, adding video-derived feeding duration to body weight, fat-corrected milk and days in milk reduced RMSE from 2.015 to 1.763 kg DM/day, MAE from 1.267 to 1.159 kg DM/day and MAPE from 4.5% to 4.2%, while R{superscript 2} increased from 0.500 to 0.617. A secondary reduced index achieved RMSE 2.362 kg DM/day and MAPE 5.8% across held-out cows. Cow-level analysis delineated the operating domain: median per-cow MAPE was 4.15%, whereas the sole cow at 15 days in milk had MAPE 28.8%. Two independently recorded veterinary events were temporally concordant with unusual feeding trajectories, providing descriptive biological context. Because the endpoint was NRC-derived, these metrics quantify reference reconstruction rather than accuracy against observed intake. By converting continuous behavioural events into auditable cow-day states, the framework links physical animals to physiologically contextualized digital counterparts and establishes a scalable foundation for operator-focused dairy digital-twin decision support.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.