Back

Complete mitochondrial genomes of Arizona West Nile virus vectors, Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex tarsalis

Barrand, Z. A.; Ridenour, C. L.; Erickson, D. E.; Rivas, A. N.; Schmidt, B. K.; Will, J.; Young, S. J.; Busser, N.; Townsend, J.; Enriquez, D.; Murphy, D.; Wong, S.; Keats, J.; Carvalho, S. T.; Attardo, G. M.; Barker, C. M.; Hepp, C. M.

2026-08-21 genomics
10.64898/2026.08.14.744795 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Here we report a newly developed method utilizing long-range PCR and long-read Pacific Biosciences HiFi sequencing that successfully obtained two full-length and annotated mitochondrial genomes from Culex quinquefasciatus Say, 1823 and Culex tarsalis Coquillett, 1896, both from Maricopa County, Arizona, USA. Given the substantial burden of West Nile virus in Maricopa County over the past decade, and that these vectors are primarily responsible for spillover to human populations in the county, it is critical to better understand their distribution over time and space. This study begins to approach this need by contributing a novel approach that has resulted in the first West Nile virus vector mitochondrial genomes from Arizona. Our circular Cx. quinquefasciatus mitogenome is 15,587 bp in length, making it the first USA-based mitogenome sequenced through the AT-rich control region. The Cx. tarsalis mitochondrial genome is 16,416 bp long, longer than recently published California-based CTarK1 and Texas-based PQ585801 mitogenomes. The increased length of the Cx. tarsalis mitogenome is a result of a 905 bp insertion in the AT-rich control region, not present in the species publicly available mitogenomes. A maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic reconstruction supports the species designation of these newly-sequenced mitogenomes. The newly developed methodology offers a unique approach to study medically-important vector species around the globe, providing a solution to study populations through pooled vector pathogen surveillance programs.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.