Back

PlantAI: A Multi-Agent System for Plant Functional Genomics Analysis and Biological Knowledge Interpretation

Wu, T.; Yang, Z.; Shi, J.; Zou, M.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, S.; Xia, C.; Kong, L.; Yang, L.; Xia, Z.

2026-08-18 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.14.744760 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant functional genomics requires the integration of sequence, expression, evolutionary, regulatory and literature evidence. However, the corresponding analyses are often distributed across disparate programs, scripts and databases, creating substantial barriers to task organization and result interpretation. Here, we present PlantAI, a multi-agent system that integrates bioinformatics analysis, project-level process tracking and knowledge-assisted interpretation. A Main Agent coordinates two complementary routes: an analysis route that invokes bioinformatics tools for RNA-seq and gene-family analyses, and a knowledge route that uses PlantAI-RAG for knowledge retrieval and evidence synthesis. PlantAI-RAG currently contains 31,207 plant-science literature records, comprising approximately 3.82 million normalized entities and 8.25 million literature-supported relation assertions. In an evaluation using plant-science questions, it achieved a Gold evidence-assertion recall of 86.7%, while strict accuracy ranged from 77% to 82% across three independent evaluator models. We further demonstrate an end-to-end task using 24 rice RNA-seq libraries collected under salt stress, spanning transcriptome analysis, candidate-family screening, HXK/HKL family analysis and knowledge-assisted interpretation, and prioritize OsHXK8 for experimental validation. By preserving analysis artifacts, run manifests, logs and environment records, PlantAI supports result verification and repeat execution while linking project-derived results to traceable literature evidence. Together, these capabilities provide an integrated and auditable framework to support plant functional genomics research.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.