Back

Altered Speech Processing in Childhood Listening Difficulties as Revealed by Chirped Speech Event-Related Potentials

Petley, L.; Wicks, T.; Miller, L. M.; Blankenship, C.; Chatwin, J.; Bormann, B. M.; Whittle, R. S.; Moore, D. R.

2026-08-17 otolaryngology
10.64898/2026.08.13.26360392 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Impaired understanding of noisy or degraded speech is a central feature of listening difficulties (LiD), but the possible causes of these symptoms are wide-ranging. Accordingly, recent research underscores the need to study these deficits using a test battery approach. Event-related potentials are useful objective metrics for studying LiD, but probing function across the speech processing hierarchy using traditional protocols is sequential and unrealistic in clinical settings. The novel chirped speech (Cheech) method combines natural speech with acoustic chirps to overcome these limitations. This study examines its utility for profiling childhood LiD. Methods: Twenty-eight children (15 typically developing, 13 with LiD), aged 8-17 years old, listened to a 17-minute Cheech story and detected a target word within the story via button press while EEG data were collected from 53 scalp sites. Results: Cheech successfully evoked responses from the auditory brainstem response through to the brain's language centers, as reflected by the N400 effect. Unlike TD children, those with LiD demonstrated N400 effects with atypical distributions that favored frontal rather than the typical parietal sites. A trend towards a delayed and reduced amplitude Wave V was also observed. Conclusions: Hierarchical examination of speech processing using Cheech primarily implicates altered language processing as a contributing factor to LiD, with the frontal topography of the N400 effect for those with LiD potentially suggesting a greater reliance on deliberate memory retrieval during the speech perception task. Significance: LiD could arise due to auditory and/or cognitive factors. The present results demonstrate the feasibility of objective, parallel measurement across this hierarchy and point to impaired language processing as a possible mechanism.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.