Back

Characterisation and genomic analysis of bacterial nutritional endosymbionts in Australian ticks from shotgun metagenomic sequencing

Leclerc, L.; Meltzer, J.; Vazquez-Campos, X.; Duron, O.; Amoros, J.; Burns, B. P.; Lo, N.

2026-08-13 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.12.744556 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ticks are obligate hematophagous arthropods and feed exclusively on blood. As blood is nutrient-poor, ticks rely on bacterial endosymbionts to synthesise nutrients, yet the diversity and functional roles of these symbionts in Australian ticks remain largely uncharacterised. This is critical to address as these ticks are of high medical importance in Australia. In this study, shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed on Bothriocroton concolor, Bothriocroton hydrosauri, Haemaphysalis longicornis and Ixodes holocyclus, enabling the recovery of six complete or partial metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). These comprised Coxiella-like endosymbionts (CLE), a facultative Rickettsia symbiont, and two Midichloria mitochondrii strains (Ixholo1 and Ixholo2). Functional annotation of these taxon-specific symbionts revealed the absence of virulence factors and the presence of B-vitamin and/or heme biosynthesis genes, indicative of nutritional mutualism, which is essential for tick hematophagy. The CLEs additionally harbour genes of the shikimate pathway, which modulate blood feeding in ticks by regulating serotonin biosynthesis. Furthermore, functional annotation and pangenomic analysis of Midichloria spp. found evidence that the genus may encompass multiple species, as well as the retention of genes potentially associated with an intramitochondrial lifestyle in M. mitochondrii Ixholo2. Tick microbiomes are dominated by non-pathogenic microorganisms, which are often overshadowed by pathogens. These include the endosymbionts, which can influence host biology and pathogen transmission, and are fundamental for the development of diagnostic tools and taxon-specific tick biocontrols.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.