Back

Additive Effects Dominate Legume Responses to Combined Heat and Drought Stress: A Quantitative Review

Meijer, L.; Chenu, K.; Smith, M. R.; Van Haeften, S. R.; Sadras, V.

2026-08-13 plant biology
10.64898/2026.08.12.744551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Concurrent exposure to heat and drought stress compromises legume productivity, yet their combined effects are rarely quantified systematically. We compiled a database of 18 studies covering seven legume species. From these, we extracted 929 physiological, biochemical, and yield-related traits and calculated actual-to-additive ratios to classify heat-drought interactions as antagonistic (ratio < 1), additive (ratio = 1), or synergistic (ratio > 1). Additive heat-drought relationships accounted for 59 % of all classifiable observations, 37% relationships were antagonistic, and 4% synergistic. The relationship varied with species, genotype, trait, and experimental conditions highlighting the complexity of combined abiotic stress effects. The results challenge the common assumption that concurrent stresses invariably exacerbate damage and underscore the need for more realistic, quantitatively defined stress treatments as well as frameworks that integrate trait-level responses into predictive models of crop growth and development. Our synthesis provides a quantitative foundation to understand legume phenotypes under the increasingly frequent co-occurrence of heat and drought stress and identifies research areas where further work is needed to improve insight into combined stress responses. HighlightsO_LICombined heat and drought responses were mainly additive or antagonistic. C_LIO_LIEvidence is biased toward few legumes and controlled environments. C_LIO_LIField-based, multi-species studies are needed to identify adaptive traits. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.