Back

Increasing stomatal density and making the increases broad, near-continuous and quantitative positively regulate Arabidopsis growth by utilizing FSTOMAGEN

Zhao, Y.-y.

2026-08-19 plant biology
10.64898/2026.08.12.744549 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stomata are the pores on plant surface, and these tiny pores are responsible for the flow of gas between plants and atmosphere. Currently, what effects of the broad and continuous increase in stomatal density achieved via genetic engineering on plant growth and development remain poorly understood. The 9 Arabidopsis transgenic lines with increased stomatal density were acquired through overexpressing FSTOMAGEN (the homologs of STOMAGEN, which are in Flaveria). The intermediate stomatal density (SD) lines exhibited increased trend in biomass. Compared with the lines with low SD, the biomass of Arabidopsis lines with intermediate SD (484 mm-2) significantly increased. There was a positive and significant correlation between biomass and relative water content. Across these transgenic lines, only during the earlier phase of growth, the leaf area exhibited a gradually increased trend as stomatal density increased, and there was both a significant linear relationship between SD and leaf growth rate and a strong linear relationship between SD and leaf area. In contrast, a clear relationship during the later phase wasnt observed. Under lower growth light intensity, there was an increased trend of biomass from other lines to the lines with intermediate SD, and the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of the intermediate line were significantly increased. This study reveals plant-growth alterations that correspond to broad and near-continuous increases in stomatal density achieved via genetic engineering. Our study sheds light on the prerequisites for elevated stomatal density achieved via genetic engineering to promote plant growth.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.