Back

SPARKLE: evidence-constrained correction of local RNA leakage in high-resolution spatial transcriptomics

Wang, S.; Zhu, B.; Li, S.; Wei, X.

2026-08-20 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.12.744394 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-resolution sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics, including Stereo-seq and Visium HD, aggregates dense capture units into cell-resolved expression matrices. During tissue processing and permeabilization, RNA released from source cells can spread to neighbouring capture locations, reducing cell-type specificity and biasing downstream analyses. Here we developed SPARKLE (Spatial Ambient RNA Kernel-based Leakage Estimator), a cell-level correction method that uses capture locations outside cell-segmentation masks as within-sample spatial evidence of leakage. SPARKLE fits sparse spatial kernels to out-of-mask observations to estimate a sample-level propagation scale and gene-specific leakage coefficients. It corrects only genes supported by out-of-mask goodness of fit and uses expression-dependent conservative shrinkage to protect highly expressing source cells. Across ten simulated scenarios, SPARKLE achieved the highest cell-wise concordance and the lowest RMSE in 9 of 10 scenarios. In axolotl brain, mouse brain and human ovarian cancer, SPARKLE removed ectopic marker signal from neighbouring cells while retaining source-cell expression, improved agreement with independent single-cell and single-nucleus references, and recovered COL1A2-SDC4 signaling of fibroblast origin that collagen diffusion had obscured. Conclusions remained stable across plausible spatial scales and background-bin sizes. Runtime scaled near-linearly with tissue-window area, and was further acceleration on GPU. SPARKLE is therefore a reference-free, fast and scalable method for correcting local RNA leakage from evidence contained within each sample, improving the reliability of cell-type localization, tissue-compartment identification and cell-cell communication inference.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.