Back

Reconsidering the Use of Dimethyl Sulfoxide for Xenobiotic-Gut Microbiota Interaction Studies

Cheng, Q.; Glesener, H.; Sanchez Carreon, A.; Voth-Gaeddert, L.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R.

2026-08-13 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.12.743806 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionGut microbiota are vulnerable to foreign chemicals (xenobiotics) including pharmaceuticals, environmental pollutants, and dietary contaminants such as aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and fumonisin B1 (FB1). Assessing the effect of these xenobiotics in the laboratory requires their dissolution in a solvent vehicle, such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). While DMSO is typically used at low concentrations under the assumption of neutrality, its independent impact on microbial dynamics is a potential experimental confounder that has not been fully explored. MethodsHuman fecal microbiota were cultivated invitrofor 16 days, supplemented with 0, 10, 100, and 1000 ppb of the tested xenobiotics (AFB1 or FB1) in 0.05% DMSO (v/v), with a DMSO-free control included for comparison. Microbial community dynamics were characterized via full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and metabolic activity was assessed by measuring production of short-chain fatty acids and gases. ResultsDMSO significantly altered microbial metabolism and drove the consistent enrichment of Desulfovibriodesulfuricans. This shift occurred across all AFB1 and FB1 treatment groups regardless of their concentrations, indicating that the biological impact of the DMSO vehicle overshadowed the specific effects of the xenobiotics. DiscussionThese findings demonstrate that DMSO can induce significant microbial shifts independent of the xenobiotics under study, potentially confounding biological interpretations. This highlights a critical need for rigorous vehicle validation and the identification of safe thresholds for solvents used in microbiota research.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.