Back

A Natural-History Study of Reproductive Scaling and Clonality in Co-Occurring Catopsis Griesb.

Felton, J. M.; Escalante, K. T.; Cayetano, D. T.; Mendez, K. D.; Specht, C. D.

2026-08-13 plant biology
10.64898/2026.08.12.742214 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWMulti-species communities of epiphytic bromeliads are a defining component of Neotropical canopies, yet we have little knowledge of how closely related species differ in the balance struck among vegetative growth, clonal propagation, and sexual reproduction. We compared reproductive output, clonality, and sexual systems in sympatric populations of Catopsis nutans (Sw.) Griseb. and Catopsis sessiliflora (Ruiz & Pav.) Mez occupying citrus groves in central Belize, sampling 235 reproductively mature individuals across 138 host trees in nine groves. Reproductive output, measured as the count of reproductive structures per individual, was modeled with negative binomial generalized linear mixed models that accounted for vegetative size and host tree identity. All sampled C. nutans were hermaphroditic, whereas all C. sessiliflora were unisexual, representing a dioecious population. Reproductive output increased with vegetative size in both species, and the scaling relationship did not differ between them despite their differing sexual systems. After accounting for size, C. sessiliflora produced more reproductive structures and more connected pups than C. nutans, and we found no evidence of a trade-off between clonal and sexual output in both species. Within C. sessiliflora, staminate individuals produced more flowers than pistillate individuals across comparable sizes. Co-occurring Catopsis can differ markedly in baseline reproductive and clonal output while sharing a conserved scaling of output on vegetative size, offering a foundation for further comparisons of sex-specific reproductive allometry in bromeliads.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.