Small but systematic bias introduced by EEG electrodes in PET imaging

Purpose: Attenuation correction (AC) of PET images is essential for accurate quantification. Brain PET studies comprising simultaneous EEG (PETEEG) may suffer from metal artifacts in CT images (CTEEG), or improper correction when electrodes are not present in the CT (CT0). As these influences are not well-characterized, we aim to compare metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques for CTEEG images, and evaluate differences between attenuated-corrected PETEEG using CT0 and CTEEG with MAR, synthetically placed electrodes (CTEEG-synth) and extended Hounsfield unit (HU) range. Methods: 19 healthy participants underwent two total-body PET/CT scans with [18F]FDG, with and without 32 EEG scalp electrodes, respectively. We evaluated five MARs to reduce streaks caused by the EEG electrodes in the CTEEG. Finally, CT0, CTEEG with (CTEEG-iMAR-Ext) and without extended HU range (CTEEG-iMAR) and CTEEG-synth were used to perform attenuation correction of PETEEG. We compared our results to PET0/CT0 scan using relative differences. Results: CTEEG and CTEEG-iMAR showed the smallest differences to CT0. PETEEG/CTEEG-iMAR-Ext exhibited the lowest differences to PET0/CT0 (average bias across all regions of -0.46%), followed by similar performance of PETEEG/CTEEG-iMAR (-0.73%) and PETEEG/CTEEG (-0.76%). Conversely, PETEEG/CT0 demonstrated the largest average differences (-1.81%), with values reaching -2.71% in the parietal lobe. These differences were consistent across subjects, yielding significant effects in most of the brain (pFWE < 0.05). CTEEG-synth performed not as good as CTEEG (-1.21%). Conclusions: CTEEG with extended HU range is most suitable for attenuation correction of PETEEG images, with MAR correction offering little additional improvement.