Back

PINT: Pathway-pathway interactions for predicting interpretable clinical outcomes from gene expression

Parsa, S. P.; Baek, B.; Ko, E.; Kosaraju, S. C.; Kang, M.

2026-08-19 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.11.744286 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationDisease mechanisms emerge from the coordinated activity of multiple biological pathways, rather than from individual pathways acting in isolation. Existing pathway-based deep learning models, however, treat pathways as independent entities, aggregating their representations through fully connected layers that disregard inter-pathway relationships. This architectural limitation overlooks an important dimension of disease biology, potentially constraining both predictive performance and the capacity to generate biologically meaningful interpretations. ResultsWe introduce a pathway-based attentive interpretability model, named PINT, that models interactions among pathways through a self-attention mechanism from gene expression data. An attention-based pooling layer further identifies patient-specific pathway contributions to the final prediction. Evaluation across five TCGA cancer datasets demonstrated that PINT consistently outperformed benchmark models in survival analysis. More importantly, PINT identifies pathways significantly associated with survival as well as reveals biologically meaningful interactions among pathways. In the BRCA dataset, PINT identified significant pathways, pathway-pathway interactions, and gene-level contributions within pathways for individual patients, most of which were supported by existing literature. Specifically, the RAS signaling pathway emerged as significantly associated with patient survival, and the learned interaction scores recovered known relationships between RAS signaling and several regulatory pathways, including cAMP, TNF, and Rap1 signaling. Availability and implementationThe source code and data are available at https://github.com/datax-lab/PINT.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.