Correction of the cytosine deamination artifacts in FFPE-based sequencing experiments
Płonka, W.; Kostka, D.; Lalik, A.; Kurpas, M.; Dinh, K. N.; Sitkiewicz, M.; Kimmel, M.; Rzyman, W.; Jaksik, R.
Show abstract
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues remain an essential resource for molecular studies, yet formalin-induced cytosine deamination introduces characteristic C>T/G>A artifacts that compromise the accuracy of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses. Numerous computational methods and enzymatic DNA repair strategies have been proposed to reduce these artifacts, but no systematic comparison across tools and experimental conditions exists. Here, we evaluate the performance of seven computational approaches (SOBDetector, Ideafix, MicroSEC, FFPolish, DeepOmics FFPE/FFPE-PLUS, FFPErase) together with the NEBNext(R) FFPE DNA Repair Mix v2, a multi-enzyme repair system applied during DNA preparation. Using three independent datasets, one based on whole genome sequencing (CGCI-BL) and two on whole exome sequencing (TCGA-PC and SUT-LUAD, the latter containing enzymatically repaired samples), and matched fresh-frozen samples as the gold standard, we assess precision, sensitivity, and artifact reduction efficiency across all methods. We further examine the potential synergy between enzymatic repair and post-sequencing computational filtering. Our results provide practical guidelines for FFPE artifact correction and demonstrate that enzymatic treatment provides the best results, while among the computational methods, FFPErase offers the most robust reduction of cytosine deamination artifacts while maximizing the retention of true somatic variants. KEY MESSAGESO_LIFormalin fixation in FFPE samples introduces artifacts that can significantly affect the accuracy of NGS analyses. C_LIO_LIAmong the evaluated approaches, enzymatic repair using NEBNext(R) FFPE DNA Repair Mix v2 achieves the most effective reduction of sequencing artifacts. C_LIO_LIComputational methods vary in performance, with FFPErase showing the most robust balance between artifact removal and retention of true somatic variants. C_LIO_LICombining enzymatic repair with computational filtering did not lead to consistent improvements in performance across datasets. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- SAMURAI: Shallow Analysis of copy nuMber alterations Using a Reproducible And Integrated bioinformatics pipeline 93%
- labelSeg: segment annotation for tumor copy number alteration profiles 93%
- DeepSSV: detecting somatic small variants in paired tumor and normal sequencing data with convolutional neural network 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- cfDNA UniFlow: A unified preprocessing pipeline for cell-free DNA data from liquid biopsies 95%
- Comparative analysis of eccDNA and circRNA tools shows increased accuracy of tool combination 94%
- Genetic demultiplexing of pooled single-cell RNA-sequencing samples in cancer facilitates effective experimental design 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole genome sequencing with AVITI and NovaSeq X Plus reveals comparable performance with contextual biases 95%
- Characterization and Mitigation of Fragmentation Enzyme-Induced Dual Stranded Artifacts 94%
- Lancet2: Improved and accelerated somatic variant calling with joint multi-sample local assembly graph 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.