Back

An Automated Patient Identity Verification Framework for Multimodal Medical Imaging Using Deep Metric Learning and Domain Adaptation

Ueda, Y.; Ishida, T.

2026-08-12 health informatics
10.64898/2026.08.11.26360177 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Patient identity management is fundamental to healthcare information systems, as identification inconsistencies can compromise patient safety, data integrity, and clinical workflow efficiency. Reliable linkage of medical images acquired across different imaging modalities remains challenging because of variations in image appearance, acquisition geometry, and imaging characteristics. In this study, we developed an automated patient identity verification framework for multimodal medical imaging using deep metric learning and Data-Augmented Domain Adaptation (DADA). Methods: The proposed framework learned modality-invariant patient representations from labeled source-domain data while leveraging unlabeled target-domain data to mitigate cross-modality distribution shifts. Chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scout images obtained under routine clinical conditions were retrospectively collected and used for evaluation. Verification performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) used as the primary performance metric. Results: The proposed framework achieved consistently high verification performance across all evaluation conditions, with AUC values ranging from 0.9997 to 0.9998. Similarity-score distributions demonstrated distinct separation between same-patient and different-patient image pairs despite substantial differences between imaging modalities. Conclusion: These findings indicate that patient-specific anatomical representations can be preserved across heterogeneous imaging domains through metric learning and domain adaptation. The proposed framework may serve as a practical infrastructure component for patient identity management, multimodal data integration, quality assurance, and patient safety applications within healthcare information systems.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.