Back

Food Addiction Symptoms in Adults with Alcohol Use Disorder

Barb, J. J.; Yang, L.; Yarmovsky, J.; Schwandt, M.; Ramchandani, V.; Diazgranados, N.; Gearhardt, A. N.; Leggio, L.

2026-08-12 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.08.11.26360166 medRxiv
Show abstract

Food addiction (FA) has been proposed as a phenotype sharing features with substance use disorders. Despite increasing recognition of food addiction as a behavioral phenotype with features overlapping substance use disorders, little is known about its prevalence or clinical significance among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Objective: To examine the prevalence of FA and to evaluate demographic, psychological, and alcohol-related correlates in individuals with AUD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis included 743 adults with AUD who were either treatment seeking (Tx) (n = 534) for AUD and were enrolled in an inpatient program at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center or not treatment-seeking (non Tx) (n = 209). Main Outcomes and Measures: FA symptoms were assessed using the Yale Food Addiction Scale, with >=2 symptoms categorized as FA in this report. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, education, and income were conducted separately within each cohort. Results: Among 743 adults with AUD, 238 (32.1%) met criteria for FA symptoms, with similar prevalence among Tx (32.6%) and nonTx (30.6%) participants despite marked differences in clinical characteristics. Across both cohorts, FA was independently associated with higher body mass index, greater psychological distress, and greater alcohol dependence severity. Childhood trauma and poorer sleep quality were additionally associated with FA among treatment-seeking participants, whereas alcohol-related measures differed according to treatment status. Conclusions and Relevance: FA was common among adults with AUD and was associated with greater psychological, behavioral, and metabolic burden regardless of treatment-seeking status. These findings suggest that FA identifies a clinically meaningful subgroup of individuals with AUD who may benefit from more comprehensive assessment and integrated treatment approaches.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.