Pre-Supplementary Motor Area Theta Burst Stimulation Alters Corticomotor Facilitation and Action Reinitiation Without Impairing Response Inhibition
Lie, E. O.; Erga, A. H.; MacDonald, H. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) is increasingly being explored as a neuromodulation target for impulsive behaviour in several clinical populations. Treatment effects are generally interpreted as improvements in inhibitory control. However, healthy studies report improved/impaired/unchanged inhibitory control following identical preSMA stimulation protocols, and few studies examine accompanying neurophysiological changes. We therefore investigated whether preSMA stimulation influences downstream corticomotor excitability to modify a general stopping mechanism, other components of action control, or wider cue-dependent attentional processes relevant to impulsive behaviour. MethodsIn a preregistered, double-blind crossover study, 18 healthy adults received active and sham continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over right preSMA. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), anticipatory response inhibition task measures, and alcohol dot-probe reaction times were collected before and after stimulation and analysed with linear mixed models. ResultsMEPs increased during sham (p = .028) but not after active cTBS (p = .741). Active cTBS did not affect complete or partial stopping on the response inhibition task. Instead, active cTBS slowed the continuing response after partial stopping (p < .001) whereas response execution sped up across the sham session (p < .001). No alcohol attentional bias or stimulation effect was detected. ConclusionsPreSMA cTBS did not impair general inhibitory or attentional control. Instead, it attenuated session-related corticomotor facilitation and selectively slowed reinitiation of a partially inhibited action. These findings suggest that clinical effects to impulsive behaviour from preSMA neuromodulation are primarily rooted in changes to motor preparation and action updating rather than a unitary stopping mechanism.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in Genetic Correlations between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder-Related Phenotypes Compared to Alcohol Consumption-Related Phenotypes 90%
- Neurophysiological Changes Associated with Vibroacoustically-augmented Breath-focused Mindfulness for Dissociation: Targeting Interoception and Attention 90%
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training in adolescent boys with ADHD: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond the Surface: Deep TMS Efficacy in Reducing Craving in Addictive Disorders. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
- Clinical and functional connectivity outcomes of 5-Hz repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment in cocaine use disorder: a double-blind randomized controlled trial 92%
- Negative affective traits moderate transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on memory 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.