Back

Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance (RT QA) of adjuvant fractionated radiotherapy for atypical meningioma in the ROAM/EORTC1308 trial

Mayles, H. M.; Haylock, B. J.; Whitfield, G.; Mehta, S.; Brass, R.; Brain, A.; Jenkinson, M. D.; Weber, D. C.; ROAM/EORTC-1308 trial management group, ; TROG and UK RTTQA group,

2026-08-12 oncology
10.64898/2026.08.10.26360149 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ROAM/EORTC-1308 is an international (Europe and Australasia) phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing radiotherapy (60Gy/30#) to observation after surgery for atypical meningioma. The treatment plans of all the patients randomised to radiotherapy were reviewed and approved prior to treatment delivery, either by the UK RTTQA group (European sites) or the Australian TROG (Australia and New Zealand). Pretrial credentialling included outlining and planning a benchmark case (DR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Variations from the guidelines were noted in quality assurance (QA) reports both for DR and for the on-trial Individual Case Reviews (ICRs) and classed as major or minor. After recruitment had finished, a random 10% of the ICRs were independently reviewed for audit purposes. We used the QA reports to analyse the variations in the DR and in the ICRs RESULTS: 56 sites (20 UK, 25 EORTC, 11 TROG) undertook the DR of which 13 (23%) had major variations. During the trial 64 patients at 28 sites received radiotherapy, the median being 2 patients per site. Overall, 25 (39%) patient cases needed resubmitting: 22 (36%) sets of outlines (2 cases twice) and 12 (14%) treatment plans (1 plan twice). CONCLUSIONS: For complex radiotherapy of rare tumours, a DR is insufficient and prospective ICRs of all patients is required. The consistent high-quality radiotherapy in ROAM/EORTC1308 ensures the primary outcome (progression free survival) will be a robust assessment and any difference between treatment arms cannot be attributed to variation in radiotherapy treatment.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.