Back

Bayesian Dose-Finding for Theta Burst Stimulation Tolerability: A Randomized Study Comparing Intermittent and Continuous Protocols at Distinct Prefrontal Targets

Kypriotakis, G.; McTeague, L. M.; Karam-Hage, M.; Taylor, B. A.; Shete, S.; Versace, F.

2026-08-12 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.08.10.26360147 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is an efficient form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, but tolerability may depend on target and stimulation pattern, limiting translation to accelerated protocols. Objective: To estimate tolerable intensities for intermittent TBS (iTBS) over F3, approximating left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and continuous TBS (cTBS) over Fp1, intended to engage more anterior ventral/frontopolar circuitry, in non-treatment-seeking adults with obesity or tobacco use disorder. Methods: In an open-label randomized crossover titration study, 64 adults completed two TBS visits 7 days apart. Each visit included 3 sessions of 600 pulses, beginning at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT) with protocol-permitted escalation or de-escalation. The primary endpoint was participant-level maximum final maintained intensity. Bayesian grouped-binomial logistic regression estimated the intensity tolerated by 70% of participants (ED70), and a prespecified rule selected the highest dose with at least 80% posterior probability of meeting 70% tolerability. Results: Observed tolerability at 80% RMT was 86.4% for iTBS and 51.6% for cTBS. Primary-model ED70 was 105.5% RMT (95% credible interval [CrI], 99.0%-113.9%) for iTBS and 69.2% RMT (95% CrI, 65.0%- 73.4%) for cTBS. The recommended intensity was 100% RMT for iTBS and 60% RMT for cTBS; no cTBS dose at or above 80% RMT met criterion. cTBS produced greater immediate symptom burden, whereas 24-hour symptoms were uncommon. Conclusion: iTBS over F3 supported a future-trial design window of 90%-100% RMT, whereas cTBS over Fp1 showed a tolerability ceiling below 80% RMT. Future cTBS protocols targeting ventral prefrontal circuitry may need to move dorsally to improve tolerability.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.