Back

Internal Dose Benchmarking of Acrylamide Exposure and Peripheral Neuropathy Risk: A National Population-Based Validation Study

Hamed, K. J. A.; Bundid, R. M.; Sayah, M. A.; Gamal, M.; Taha, R. S. M.; Nuri, N.

2026-08-12 toxicology
10.64898/2026.08.10.26360101 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background. Acrylamide, a neurotoxicant in heated foods and smoke, is linked to occupational neuropathy, but evidence regarding chronic, low-level population exposure remains limited. We evaluated the association between acrylamide exposure biomarkers and peripheral neuropathy among U.S. adults. Methods. A total of 2,266 NHANES 2003-2004 participants (age >40) were analyzed. Exposure was assessed via hemoglobin adducts (HbAA/HbGA); neuropathy via monofilament testing >1 site). Survey-weighted logistic regression models adjusted for confounders. Sensitivity analyses included cubic splines, diabetes stratification, and multiple imputation. Results. Neuropathy prevalence was 15.5%. In adjusted models, neither adduct was associated with neuropathy (HbAA OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.82-1.17; HbGA OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.08). No dose-response gradient was observed. Expected risk factors (age, diabetes) showed strong associations, validating model sensitivity. The null result remained robust across sensitivity analyses, including a stricter outcome definition and multiple imputation (pooled OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.83-1.14). Conclusions. Acrylamide adducts were not associated with peripheral neuropathy in this national sample. General population levels (~55-70 pmol/g) lie well below established occupational no-observed-adverse-effect levels (~510 pmol/g) and clinical neuropathy thresholds (~6,000 pmol/g), providing a mechanistically coherent explanation for this null result.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.