Racial differences in lifetime healthcare costs associated with obesity-related multimorbidity among the U.S. population aged 40 years or older
Zanwar, P. P.; Wang, M.; Logan, N.; Chang, S.-H.
Show abstract
Introduction: Research has documented that obesity and morbidity are associated. Black persons in the United States (U.S.) incur higher financial costs of obesity-related multimorbidity (ORM). However, lifetime healthcare costs (LHCs) remain underexamined for these populations. Objective: We quantified racial differences in 1) LHCs and 2) lifetime healthcare cost differential (LCD) associated with ORM for ages > 40 years. Methods: We used the 2008- 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component to examine unique obesity-related diseases (ORDs): high blood sugar, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and stroke. We used a prior published Markov model to simulate a person's life history of ORDs and compute LHCs among ages > 40 years. We computed LCD-associated ORM as the difference in LHC for those with ORM and LHC for members without ORDs. We quantified differences in race as the difference between LHC or LCD among White and Black men and women. Results: Our analytic sample included 53,035 Black and White persons representing 97,229,611 (S.E., 2,104,365), 12.4% as Black and 87.6% as White persons. ORM was more prevalent in the Black (21.2%) than the White group (13.4%). LHCs by race (Black/White) for women/men with ORM and LCDs associated with ORM (2012$) were $3 1,035/43,595 and $11,350/26,948 for age 40-49, $2 1,567/25,6 115 and $3,846/9,808 for 50-59, $9,863/18,515 and -$2,566/7,426 for 60-69, -$8,220/16,285 and -$11,524/3,865 for 70-79. Conclusions: Racial Differences in LHCs and LCDs related to ORM persist and vary across subpopulations. Future interventions designed to prevent/manage ORM are crucial for prioritizing populations with high LHCs and advancing health equity.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence of frailty-related fracture among Medicaid beneficiaries living with HIV and cancer: A cohort study 91%
- Covid-19 and Excess Mortality in Medicare Beneficiaries 91%
- Estimating the dietary and health impact of implementing mandatory front-of-package nutrient disclosures in the US: a policy scenario modeling analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust causal inference for long-term policy decisions: cost effectiveness of interventions for obesity using Mendelian randomization 92%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 92%
- Trends in weight gain recorded in English primary care before and during the Coronavirus-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does COVID-19 vaccination improve mental health? A difference-in-difference analysis of the Understanding Coronavirus in America study 89%
- Lost Opportunity in Tobacco Cessation Care: The Impact of Underbilling in a Large Health System 87%
- Willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 in the US: Longitudinal evidence from a nationally representative sample of adults from April–October 2020 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative Social Disadvantage and Health-Related Quality of Life: National Health Interview Survey 2013-2017 92%
- The potential health impact and healthcare cost savings of different sodium reduction strategies in Canada 91%
- Life-course social disparities in body mass index trajectories across adulthood: cohort study evidence from China Health and Nutrition Survey 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of bariatric surgery on monthly earnings and employment: a national linked data study in England, 2014-2022 92%
- Genetic and environmental influences on educational disparities in adult weight change: an individual-based pooled analysis of 11 twin cohorts 90%
- Obesity, walking pace and risk of severe COVID-19: Analysis of UK Biobank 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.