Back

Systematic assessment of transcriptomic and phenotypic biological profiling for mechanism-based hazard assessment using target-annotated reference chemicals in renal proximal tubular epithelial cells

van Kessel, H. W.; Wedler, M.; Helmke, P.; Zigure, D.; Ferguson, S. S.; Harrill, J.; Ecker, G.; Liu, S.; Oelgeschläger, M.; Callegaro, G.; van de Water, B.

2026-08-17 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.08.08.743660 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Integrating high-throughput in vitro data into next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) workflows requires screening strategies that yield quantitative potency estimates and mechanistically interpretable biological signals. Transcriptomic and morphological profiling are increasingly adopted for early-stage hazard identification by enabling triage of substances for resource-intensive follow-up and prioritizing candidates most likely to present meaningful risk. In this study, we aimed to characterize biological concordance and uncertainty by quantifying how well high-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) and Cell Painting PLUS (CPP) bioactivity profiles recover target-relevant biological signals in immortalized human renal proximal tubule epithelial RPTEC/TERT1 cells using 313 reference chemicals with high-confidence target annotations. Through quality control procedures and biological activity filters we yielded 142 reference chemicals spanning 66 different targets, which were systematically evaluated for biological concentration-responses by HTTr and CPP. HTTr was evaluated using TXG-MAPr-based qualitative and quantitative gene network activity analysis. HTTr showed the most prominent activity for targets that were highest expressed in RPTEC/TERT1 cells. Active chemical-pairs showed strong gene network activity correlation albeit with different potencies. Similarly, the highest transcriptomic concordance was observed for reference chemicals acting in the same pathway, such as EGFR/MEK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR. CPP often showed high sensitivity primarily at the organelle level providing limited statistical power for chemical grouping. Collectively, the results support HTTr and CPP as complementary early-tier assays within an in vitro weight-of-evidence safety testing framework. Although CPP is suitable as a cost-effective screening modality, HTTr offers higher mechanistic resolution for mode-of-action inference in high-throughput bioactivity screening and therefore remains necessary for high-confidence mechanistic interpretation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.