Acceptability and implementation of digital mental health supports for marginalised young people across Ireland: A mixed-methods study
Kealy, C.; Mc Loughlin, A.; Madrid-Cagigal, A.; O'Neill, S.; Donohoe, G.; Mulvenna, M. D.; Barry, M. M.
Show abstract
Digital mental health tools are increasingly promoted as scalable supports for young people, yet implementation remains inconsistent, particularly for marginalised youth. Acceptability and usability are key determinants of successful adoption, but little is known about how these factors shape engagement across diverse youth populations. The aim of the study was to examine the acceptability, usability, and implementation potential of 11 evidence?based digital mental health tools among marginalised young people across the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI). A mixed?methods design integrated baseline surveys (n = 38), a two?week trial of digital tools delivered through a co?designed Google Site, online workshops/individual interviews (n = 22), and a final usability and engagement survey (n = 24). Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), engagement using the Twente Engagement with E?Health Technologies Scale (TWEETS), and mental wellbeing using the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well?Being Scale (SWEMWBS). Qualitative data were analysed thematically and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Only two tools exceeded the SUS usability benchmark. Engagement was moderate overall, with one tool achieving the highest engagement despite lower usability. SWEMWBS scores indicated moderate baseline mental wellbeing. Thematic analysis identified five acceptability themes: credibility and trust; accessibility and ease of use; positive content supporting emotional regulation; personalisation and self?monitoring; and engagement and habit formation. CFIR analysis highlighted usability, institutional trust, cultural relevance, and emotional needs as core implementation determinants. Digital literacy was high and supported engagement, and usability remained a critical gateway to implementation. Designers and commissioners of digital mental health tools should ensure that supports are simple, trustworthy, culturally relevant, and youth?centred to enable adoption among marginalised young people. Implementation strategies are needed that will co?design with diverse youth communities and prioritise youth work settings as well as governance clarity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Mental Health Service engagement changes during Covid-19 in children and young people across the UK: presenting concerns, service activity, and access by gender, ethnicity, and deprivation 95%
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 95%
- Identifying subgroups with differential levels of service response to a digital screening and service navigation program for unmet social care needs 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 93%
- Mobile consulting (mConsulting) as an option for accessing healthcare services for communities in remote rural areas and urban slums in low- and middle- income countries: A mixed methods study 93%
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing Home-Based Digital Health in Rural Canada: A Scoping Review 95%
- The development of a World Health Organization transdiagnostic chatbot intervention for distressed adolescents and young adults 94%
- Leveraging Telemedicine To Improve Mnch Uptake In Kenya: A Community- Based Hybrid Model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Generative AI for Health Among Urban Youth in Pakistan: A Mixed-Methods Study 95%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Has the pandemic enhanced and sustained digital health-seeking behaviour? A big data interrupted time-series analysis of Google Trends 93%
- How the COVID-19 pandemic is favoring the adoption of digital technologies in healthcare: a literature review 93%
- Towards Participatory Precision Health: Systematic Review and Co-designed Guidelines For Adolescent Just-in-time Adaptive Interventions 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.