Back

Hydrogel formulation controls size-dependent accumulation of proteins and nanoparticles in PEG microparticles

Arnheim, A.; Morales, I.; Tran, A.; Di Carlo, D.

2026-08-10 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.07.741917 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hydrogels are widely used in sensing, delivery, and tissue engineering because their transport properties can be tuned through material design. However, while hydrogel permeability is often characterized using small molecules, many practical applications depend on the uptake and retention of much larger species, including protein conjugates and nanoparticles. Here, we systematically investigate how polyethylene glycol (PEG)-acrylate hydrogel microparticle formulation influences accumulation of signal-generating probes spanning a broad size range. We fabricated particles across a 36-condition design space varying nominal PEG-acrylate molecular weight, polymer weight percent, and UV crosslinking dose, and related formulation-dependent probe accumulation to particle swelling behavior. Increasing nominal PEG-acrylate molecular weight and decreasing polymer weight percent produced more highly swollen particles and strongly enhanced accumulation of fluorescent streptavidin conjugates, with the largest effects observed for bulky labels such as allophycocyanin and phycoerythrin. Gold nanoparticle accumulation was even more formulation-restricted, with detectable colorimetric signal observed primarily in the most permissive formulations. These findings establish design rules linking PEG hydrogel formulation to size-dependent accumulation and show that formulations suitable for small probes may be inadequate for larger reporters. More broadly, this framework may inform the design of hydrogels for particle-based assays as well as other applications where transport of macromolecules or nanoscale materials is important.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.