The Effects of Social Isolation, Loneliness, and Nicotine Product Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evidence Update
Pascoe, R.; Saliba, C.; Kundu, A.; Hoque, S.; Milory, A.; Schwartz, R.; Chaiton, M.
Show abstract
Background: Loneliness and social isolation may contribute to tobacco and nicotine use, but existing studies have been inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined these associations among adults amid the evolving nicotine product landscape. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL identified peer-reviewed quantitative studies published between 2014 and 2025 searched in February-April 2026. Eligible studies included adults aged [≥]18 years examining loneliness and/or social isolation in relation to smoking or nicotine use. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute risk of bias tool). Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: 22 studies involving 273,954 participants met inclusion criteria, and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. A majority of the studies had low risk of bias. Meta-analysis findings showed that social isolation or loneliness was associated with significantly higher odds of nicotine product use (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.48-2.29). Although no statistically significant association of nicotine product use and social isolation or loneliness (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.72-2.53), some studies suggested bidirectional relationships, with smoking contributing to reduced social support and greater isolation over time. Sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of the meta-analysis findings. Subgroup analysis found no statistically significant differences were seen between subgroups defined by type of nicotine product, age groups, social isolation vs loneliness, measures of nicotine use behaviours and pre- vs post- COVID-19 pandemic period in the meta-regression. Limitations of included studies and analysis are discussed. Conclusions: Loneliness and social isolation are significant psychosocial correlates of nicotine product use. Cessation interventions may benefit from integrating social support and mental health strategies alongside traditional nicotine dependence treatment.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transitions from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or stopping nicotine use in ALSPAC and their association with modifiable and sociodemographic factors 94%
- The changing face of nicotine use in England: age-specific annual trends, 2014-2024 93%
- COVID-19, smoking, vaping and quitting: A representative population survey in England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey 96%
- Review of evidence regarding attributes and behaviours of smokers as smoking prevalence falls, including evidence relevant to the 'hardening hypothesis' 95%
- Impact of a regional educational advertising campaign on harm perceptions of e-cigarettes, prevalence of e-cigarette use, and quit attempts among smokers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between vaping and Covid-19: cross-sectional findings from the HEBECO study 94%
- Associations between reasons for vaping and current vaping and smoking status: Evidence from a UK based cohort 93%
- Associations between ZIP code-level alcohol outlet density and binge drinking among people who inject drugs in 22 US Metropolitan Areas 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- From Traits to Puffs: The Interplay of Personality, Pandemic Stress, and Smoking Behaviors 97%
- Neighborhood level factors and use of cigarettes, cannabis and e-cigarettes: a population-based study among Canadian adults 94%
- Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring how an e-cigarette intervention influenced tobacco smoking behaviour in people accessing homelessness services: findings from the SCeTCH trial process evaluation 93%
- Twitter Discourse on Nicotine as Potential Prophylactic or Therapeutic for COVID-19 92%
- Social-spatial network structures among young urban and suburban persons who inject drugs in a large metropolitan area 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.