Open-Source, High-Speed and High-Resolution Data Acquisition Platform for Biopotential Recordings and Neural EIT applications
Ravagli, E.; McEwan, A.; Aristovich, K.
Show abstract
ObjectiveBiopotential measurement devices, such as EEG, ECG, and EMG recorders, are available in low-cost, open-source implementations with standard specifications. However, high-end systems remain expensive and predominantly proprietary, limiting accessibility and customization by research laboratories. In addition, neurophysiology techniques such as bioimpedance-based Fast Neural Electrical Impedance Tomography (FN-EIT) also rely on these systems for data acquisition. This work aimed to develop an open-source biopotential recording system using off-the-shelf components that achieves performance comparable to high-end devices. ApproachWe designed our system to provide simultaneous sampling over 32 channels, 24-bit resolution, 10 kHz bandwidth, 50 kHz sampling rate, and battery-powered operation while reducing cost by two orders of magnitude. System performance was evaluated comparatively against a reference device. Initial validation involved benchtop recordings in saline solution and standard non-invasive biopotential measurements (ECG and EMG). Further in-vivo validation was performed by recording evoked electrophysiological responses and FN-EIT traces from the sciatic nerve of a rat during tibial branch stimulation. Main resultsEMG recordings showed comparable RMS peak amplitudes (814{+/-}153 {micro}V vs. 897{+/-}113{micro}V, p=0.07), while ECG-derived heart rates closely matched between systems (64.8{+/-}4.0 bpm vs. 65.1{+/-}3.1bpm, p=0.54). During in-vivo recordings, compound action potentials exhibited comparable amplitudes and morphology (129{+/-}26 mV vs 128{+/-}25 mV, P=0.15). FN-EIT recordings showed strongly correlated baseline voltages (R>0.93, P=0.11), sub-microvolt noise levels (0.83{+/-}0.36{micro}V vs. 0.42{+/-}0.25{micro}V, p<0.05), and comparable impedance variations (0.006{+/-}0.002% vs 0.005{+/-}0.003, P>0.05). FN-EIT images of functional activity recorded with the novel device closely matched reference ones, exhibiting a 98.5% overlap in activated area. SignificanceThe proposed open-source device has the potential to broaden research access to customizable, high-specification data acquisition hardware and facilitate wider adoption of specialized neural recording techniques such as FN-EIT.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effective correction of extreme capacitive artifacts in TMS-EEG via windowed detrending 94%
- A Block-Capable and Module-Extendable 4-Channel Stimulator for Acute Neurophysiology 94%
- Multi-modal artificial dura for simultaneous large-scale optical access and large-scaleelectrophysiology in non-human primate cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proper reference selection and re-referencing to mitigate bias in single pulse electrical stimulation data 93%
- Toolkit for Oscillatory Real-time Tracking and Estimation (TORTE) 92%
- The rt-TEP tool: real-time visualization of TMS-Evoked Potential to maximize cortical activation and minimize artifacts 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated artifact injection into sensing-capable brain modulation devices for neural-behavioral synchronization and the influence of device state 94%
- Cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of cervical vagus vs. auricular nerve: a comparative, parametric study in nonhuman primates 93%
- Neural Selectivity, Efficiency, and Dose Equivalence in Deep Brain Stimulation through Pulse Width Tuning and Segmented Electrodes. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proof-of-Concept Validation of Noninvasive Detection of Cortical Spreading Depolarization with High Resolution Direct Current-Electroencephalography 95%
- A Novel, Robust, and Portable Platform for Magnetoencephalography using Optically Pumped Magnetometers 92%
- Mapping whole brain effects of infrared neural stimulation with positron emission tomography 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.