Back

Genome-wide association study of grain iron and zinc concentrations in a diverse CIMMYT wheat panel across contrasting moisture environments

Govindan, V.; Yuan, K.; Dai, Y.; Tarekegn, Z. T.; Lu, L.; Ma, X.

2026-08-06 plant biology
10.64898/2026.08.06.743196 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Micronutrient deficiencies remain a major public-health challenge, and genetic improvement of grain iron and zinc concentrations in wheat offers a sustainable biofortification strategy. We evaluated 563 CIMMYT advanced wheat lines and six checks under restricted irrigation (two irrigations) and well-watered conditions (five irrigations) at Ciudad Obregon, Mexico. Grain iron and zinc concentrations were quantified by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Best linear unbiased estimates were calculated, and genome-wide association analyses were conducted using 8,687 high-quality single-nucleotide polymorphisms and a multi-locus mixed model that accounted for population structure. Five marker-trait associations were detected in at least two datasets. For grain zinc concentration, S3B_811421507 was detected under both irrigation regimes and in the combined analysis, whereas S3B_814372642 was detected under well-watered conditions and in the combined analysis. For grain iron concentration, S2B_73321328 and S4B_20679079 were associated with variation under restricted irrigation and in the combined analysis, while S2B_72162723 was detected under well-watered conditions and in the combined analysis. Individual loci explained 0.34% to 3.36% of phenotypic variance, consistent with the quantitative inheritance of grain micronutrient concentration. The identified alleles provide candidate targets for validation and marker-assisted biofortification breeding, while their environment-dependent effects emphasize the need to evaluate micronutrient traits across contrasting moisture conditions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.