A Preliminary Study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Cannabis Use Disorder and Its Effects on Concurrent Tobacco Use
Wada, M.; Petersen, N.; Wong, B.; Kim, B.; Kim, J. P.; Clark, A. M.; Durazzo, T.; Sahlem, G.
Show abstract
Objectives: Tobacco and cannabis co-use is common, and reductions in one substance may theoretically lead to compensatory increases in the other. This secondary analysis examined whether cannabis cue-induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (DLPFC-rTMS) affects tobacco consumption among tobacco-using individuals with cannabis use disorder (CUD). Methods: Data were analyzed from a randomized, sham-controlled trial of DLPFC-rTMS for CUD. Participants were treatment-seeking adults with moderate or severe CUD who reported baseline tobacco use. Active or sham 10-Hz DLPFC-rTMS was delivered during cannabis cue exposure over 10 treatment visits. Linear mixed-effects models examined group differences in weekly percentage change from baseline in tobacco consumption over treatment and follow-up, adjusting for baseline tobacco consumption. Additional models examined whether changes in cannabis use were associated with changes in tobacco use. Results: Twenty participants were included, with 10 assigned to active rTMS and 10 to sham. Active rTMS was associated with a greater reduction in tobacco consumption than sham at 1-week post-treatment (t = -2.49, p = 0.015). Changes in cannabis use were not significantly associated with group differences in tobacco reduction. Estimated group differences did not indicate compensatory increases in tobacco use among participants with larger reductions in cannabis use. Conclusions: Cannabis cue-induced DLPFC-rTMS was associated with a short-term reduction in tobacco consumption relative to sham among tobacco-using individuals with CUD. These preliminary findings suggest possible cross-substance effects of DLPFC-rTMS and did not indicate compensatory tobacco increases. Larger trials specifically designed for cannabis-tobacco co-use are warranted.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cannabis Use and Sleep Quality in Daily Life: a Daily Diary Study of Adults Starting Cannabis for Health Concerns 93%
- How does methamphetamine affect the brain? A systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging studies 92%
- LIBR Methamphetamine and Opioid Cue Database (LIBR MOCD): Development and Validation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frontal tDCS reduces alcohol relapse rates by increasing connections from left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to addiction networks 94%
- Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell does not decrease cocaine self-administration in cocaine-dependent rats but increases GluR1/GluA1 in the central nucleus of the amygdala 93%
- Intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on motor learning are related to dopamine 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cannabis use, depression and self-harm: phenotypic and genetic relationships 93%
- Transitions from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or stopping nicotine use in ALSPAC and their association with modifiable and sociodemographic factors 91%
- Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: A Delphi consensus study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal Neurocognitive Trajectories in a Large Cohort of Youth Who Use Cannabis: Combining Self-Report and Toxicology 92%
- Comparing neuromodulation targets to reduce cigarette craving and withdrawal: A randomized clinical trial 91%
- Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impairs visual working memory performance 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling craving- and valence-driven brain responses to smoking cues in individuals with nicotine use disorder 92%
- Reduced responsiveness of the reward system underlies tolerance to cannabis impairment in chronic users 92%
- Bipolar disorder and cannabis use: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.