Development of an interdisciplinary network to improve the capacity to conduct digital legacy research: a quality improvement initiative
Nwosu, A. C.; Tibbles, A.; Goodwin, C.; Kaye, L.; Stanley, S.
Show abstract
Background Digital legacy (the digital information available about someone following their death) has increasing societal importance as personal assets and interactions become increasingly digitized. Healthcare professionals often have a limited understanding of how to address digital legacy in practice, and there is a lack of interdisciplinary networks to improve education, research, and professional development in digital legacy. Objective This paper describes the development of an interdisciplinary initiative designed to build research capacity and develop consensus-based recommendations for integrating digital legacy into palliative care. Method Over 12-months, we conducted interdisciplinary engagement activities with diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, designers, and sociologists. We used a modified World Cafe method to facilitate dialogue and capture feedback on how memories are digitally curated, the management of digital estates, and intergenerational perspectives on digital legacy. Results We identified eight core recommendations for research and policy, including promoting digital legacy education, supporting policy development, and broadening the scope of interdisciplinary research. Our discussions highlighted the complexity of modern digital estates and the need for legal and ethical frameworks to protect individual rights. Conclusions The Network demonstrates that interdisciplinary collaboratives can address important issues relating to digital legacy, which provides a foundation to conduct collaborative research that improves the management of digital legacies in society.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Evaluating the GRACE voice assistant for dementia care among caregivers and healthcare professionals: An interview study. 92%
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 91%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing barriers to interprofessional working with homecare workers in community palliative care: insights from a multi-site qualitative case study in England 93%
- ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multi-national survey (CovPall) 91%
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model 95%
- Digital Health Interventions in Palliative Care: A Systematic Meta-Review and Evidence Synthesis 93%
- Utilization of Generative AI-drafted Responses for Managing Patient-Provider Communication 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 94%
- Identifying subgroups with differential levels of service response to a digital screening and service navigation program for unmet social care needs 93%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.