Back

Learning Shared Residue Backgrounds and Modification-Specific Offsets for PTM Site Prediction

Pokharel, S.; Bhusal, B.

2026-08-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.05.743079 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWPost-translational modifications (PTMs) are chemical changes added to proteins after translation. These changes affect protein function and regulation, and their disruption is linked to disease-associated mechanisms. Because experimentally validating all possible modification sites is impractical, many computational predictors have been developed for PTM site prediction. In this work, we study whether a shared model can represent common residue-background patterns while learning modification-specific background-to-positive offsets. This framing is especially relevant for residues such as lysine (K), which can be acetylated, ubiquitinated, methylated, or sumoylated depending on the surrounding protein context. We propose an anchor-guided rectified flow matching framework for multi-type PTM site prediction from protein language model embeddings. For each PTM-residue pair, the model builds residue-background anchors from PTM-compatible unannotated residues and positive anchors from experimentally annotated modified residues. Given a candidate residue and target modification type, the model compares the residue embedding with these anchor sets and uses a rectified flow module to estimate a modification-conditioned background-to-positive offset. This offset is combined with anchor-based features and used for site scoring. We evaluate the framework on a dbPTM-derived benchmark covering six commonly studied PTMs: phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, methylation, sumoylation, and N-linked glycosylation. In the shared-model setting, our approach achieves a macro AUPRC of 0.4195, improving over the gated multi-anchor baseline of 0.4154, while independently trained per-modification models achieve 0.4353. These results suggest that multi-type PTM prediction can be modeled within a single shared framework by combining residue-background anchors with modification-conditioned offset features.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.