Back

A patient-derived xenograft model of FUS::TFCP2 intraosseous rhabdomyosarcoma reveals chemoresistance and differential sensitivity to ALK inhibitors

Chauhan, S.; Jones, K.; Krajbich, V. A.; Smith, B.; McCallister, C.; Bui, T.; Smith, R.; Woltjer, R. L.; Wangsiricharoen, S.; Ramsay, D.; Davare, M. A.

2026-08-06 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.05.743043 bioRxiv
Show abstract

TFCP2-rearranged rhabdomyosarcoma is an exceptionally rare and highly aggressive malignancy driven by TFCP2 gene fusions and associated with a dismal clinical prognosis. Because standardized treatment regimens are lacking, developing representative preclinical models is critical for identifying effective therapies. Here, we present a case of a 29-year-old male with rapidly progressive, metastatic pelvic intraosseous rhabdomyosarcoma (iRMS) harboring a FUS::TFCP2 fusion and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) overexpression. To evaluate therapeutic vulnerabilities, we established a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model that faithfully recapitulated the histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular hallmarks of the primary tumor. High-throughput in vitro pharmacological screening of PDX-derived cells demonstrated notable resistance to standard cytotoxic chemotherapies and revealed a paradoxical and selective sensitivity profile across ALK inhibitors. The PDX-derived cells were susceptible to crizotinib, brigatinib, and ceritinib, yet resistant to the more selective second- and third-generation inhibitors alectinib and lorlatinib. Notably, next-generation ROS1/pan-TRK inhibitors (entrectinib, repotrectinib, and taletrectinib) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to the fourth-generation ALK inhibitor NVL-655. Our findings establish a validated preclinical PDX model for FUS::TFCP2 iRMS and suggest that multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibition may offer a more viable therapeutic strategy than narrow-spectrum ALK targeting or conventional chemotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.