Back

YAP-TEAD-driven CPA4 promotes NF2-deficient meningioma growth

Mineji, K.; Petrosky, K.; Otsuji, R.; Makino, Y.; Kibe, Y.; Uchida, E.; Hagita, D.; Singaravelan, N.; Ishi, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Chang, L.-S.; Gadd, S.; Hashizume, R.

2026-08-07 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.05.743013 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neurofibromin 2 (NF2) deficiency is a driver of meningioma and other cancers, yet transcriptional effectors that sustain NF2-deficient tumors remain poorly defined. We identify carboxypeptidase A4 (CPA4) as an effector of YAP-TEAD signaling in NF2-deficient meningioma. Transcriptomic profiling identified CPA4 as a consistently upregulated effector. Across patient cohorts and specimens, CPA4 expression was enriched in NF2-mutant and chromosome 22q-deleted meningiomas and associated with higher tumor grade and chromosome 1p loss. CPA4 depletion impaired proliferation, disrupted cell-cycle, DNA-replication, and DNA-repair programs, suppressed intracranial tumor growth, and prolonged survival. Integrated epigenomic and functional assays identified CPA4 as a direct YAP-TEAD transcriptional target. CPA4-high meningioma models exhibited preferential sensitivity to YAP-TEAD inhibition, while verteporfin and the clinical-stage TEAD inhibitor VT3989 reduced CPA4 expression, suppressed orthotopic tumor growth, and prolonged survival. These findings uncover a targetable YAP-TEAD-CPA4 dependency in NF2-deficient meningioma and identify CPA4 as a potential biomarker for TEAD- directed therapy. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCECPA4 links NF2 loss to oncogenic YAP-TEAD transcription, sustains meningioma growth, and marks tumor sensitivity to pharmacologic TEAD inhibition. These findings establish CPA4 as a tumor-promoting effector and potential biomarker of an actionable pathway shared across NF2- deficient cancers.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.