A 12-year retrospective analysis of cancer epidemiology at a major oncology center in Erbil, Iraq
Marouf, S. S.
Show abstract
Long-term data describing cancer patterns in Iraq remain generally limited. This retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the distribution and longitudinal patterns of malignant solid tumors diagnosed over a period of 12 years (2014-2025) at a major tertiary oncology center in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Demographic characteristics, cancer types, and temporal trend changes in cancer distribution were analyzed. Comparisons were made between the first (2014-2019) and second (2020-2025) halves of the study period. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the temporal trends. After excluding records with incomplete data, 11,704 patients were included. Breast cancer was the most frequently diagnosed malignancy, accounting for over one-quarter of all cases, followed by lung, colorectal, prostate, and bladder cancers, in descending order. Women represented the majority of patients, and the mean age at diagnosis increased significantly over time. In general, the relative distribution of colorectal, genitourinary, pancreatic, uterine, and thyroid cancers increased during the study period, whereas breast and lung cancers showed a modest but significant proportional decline despite remaining the most common malignancies. A marked reduction in case numbers was observed in 2020, followed by progressive recovery in subsequent years. To conclude, cancer patterns in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq changed substantially during the 12-year study period, with increasing proportions of colorectal and several other malignancies alongside an older age at diagnosis. These findings likely reflect a combination of demographic changes, evolving lifestyle-related risk factors, and improvements in cancer detection and referral. The results provide contemporary evidence to support regional cancer control strategies, screening programs, resource allocation, and future epidemiological research.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient Centered Perspectives on Suicidal Ideation: A Mixed Methods Investigation in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care 92%
- From Variability to Standardization: The Impact of Breast Density on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and the Need for a Structured Reporting System 91%
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correlates of Ki-67 Proliferation Index in a Cohort of Women with Suspected Breast Cancer in Lusaka, Zambia 94%
- Paediatric Palliative Care following Hospital discharge: Prevalence and factors associated with non-continuity of palliative care for children with cancer in Busoga sub-region-eastern Uganda; A mixed methods study 93%
- Health facility preparedness for early detection of symptomatic cancer in Southern Africa: a multi-centre cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Mortality in Cancer Patients: A Report from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India 93%
- A machine learning approach for identification of gastrointestinal predictors for the risk of COVID-19 related hospitalization 90%
- DNMT family induced down-regulation of NDRG1 via DNA methylation and clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Absence of Glutathione S-Transferase Theta 1 Gene is Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Pakistani Population and Poor Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case-Control and Case Series Analysis 93%
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 92%
- Underlying reasons for post-mortem diagnosed lung cancer cases – A robust retrospective comparative study from Hungary (HULC study) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.