Back

Enhanced Detection of Age-related Macular Degeneration in Low-quality Retinal Images via Noise-Augmented YOLO and Adaptive Attention Mechanisms

Bai, X.; Kishimoto, K.; Sugiyama, O.; TAMURA, H.

2026-08-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.04.742925 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study aims to improve the detection performance of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in low-quality retinal images. BackgroundAMD is a leading cause of vision loss among older adults globally, and accurate detection is crucial for clinical management. However, low-quality optical coherence tomography (OCT) images significantly compromise diagnostic accuracy. ObjectiveTo enhance AMD detection in low-quality images using noise-augmented data augmentation and an improved YOLO deep learning model. MethodsPublic datasets from UCSD and Duke University were utilized; the training dataset comprised 24,980 OCT images (high-quality and noise-augmented low-quality), while the testing dataset included 1,000 images (584 AMD, 416 normal). The model is based on the YOLOv8n framework, integrated with Squeeze-and-Excitation blocks (SEblock) and Adaptive Sparse Self-Attention (ASSA), with an additional 160x160 detection layer for detecting small lesions. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F2-score. ResultsThe proposed model achieved an accuracy of 99.02%, sensitivity of 98.17%, specificity of 100%, and an F2-score of 98.50% on the Duke dataset. Detection rates were significantly improved compared to traditional methods, particularly in low-quality images, with a detection rate of 89.60%, markedly superior to original YOLOv8n (55.10%) and classical models like ResNet50. ConclusionThe enhanced model, employing noise-augmented training data and improved attention mechanisms, demonstrates excellent AMD detection capabilities in low-quality OCT images, showing broad potential for clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.