Back

A Modular Synthetic Hydrogel with Cell-scale Micropores Modulates Osteocyte-like Morphogenesis and Osteogenic Differentiation In Vitro

Horrer, M.; Zauchner, D.; Escudero, M.; Klinaki, E.; Lim, P. J.; Rohrbach, M.; Giunta, C.; Mueller, R.; Qin, X.-H.

2026-08-04 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.04.742693 bioRxiv
Show abstract

One crucial step during early osteogenesis is the embedding of osteoblasts within a collagen-rich extracellular matrix (osteoid), where they subsequently differentiate into a functional network of osteocytes. However, reconstructing 3D osteocyte networks in vitro remains a major challenge. We recently developed a synthetic microporous hydrogel to support the in vitro culture of 3D bone cell networks. Although matrix biodegradability facilitates cell-material interactions, the influence of micropores on bone tissue morphogenesis and differentiation remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate the effect of cell-scale micropores on bone cell morphogenesis and osteogenic differentiation in vitro. By exploiting polymerization-induced phase separation (PIPS) between 4-arm polyethylene glycol vinyl sulfones and dextran in the presence of hyaluronan, we generated matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels with cell-scale micropores. Increasing the dextran concentration enlarged the average pore size from 4 m to 8 m, accompanied by a slight decrease in mechanical stiffness. Following encapsulation within these hydrogels, primary human osteoblasts remained highly viable. Hydrogels with larger pores supported extensive 3D cell network formation, whereas hydrogels with smaller pores exhibited enhanced osteogenic differentiation following 21 days of osteogenic culture. Together, these findings highlight that bone cells are sensitive to microporous physical cues and even minor changes over pore sizes can make an impact on osteocyte-like morphogenesis and differentiation in vitro.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.