Back

Label-free Isolation of Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Cell Populations via Insulator-Based Dielectrophoresis

Ozkayar, G.; Usman, I. N.; Yakin, E.; Kraan, J.; David, K.; Bosma, D.; Martens, J. W.; ten Dijke, P.; Pesch, G. R.; Boukany, P. E.

2026-08-10 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.04.742571 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are valuable biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and monitoring, yet their isolation from blood remains challenging due to their phenotypic heterogeneity and rarity. Label-free microfluidic technologies offer a promising alternative to affinity-based approaches by exploiting intrinsic biophysical differences between cell types. Here, we developed a microfluidic platform for label-free cell separation based on insulator-based dielectrophoresis (iDEP). The microfluidic device employs an array of triangular insulating structures that generate strong electric field gradients in response to an externally applied alternating current (AC) electric field, enabling selective isolation of breast cancer cells from blood cells based on their dielectric properties. Hydrodynamic focusing is used to confine the sample stream and precisely control cell trajectories within the separation region. Numerical simulations were performed to optimize the electric field distribution and fluid flow characteristics within the device. Experimental validation using breast cancer cell lines (mesenchymal-like MDA-MB-231 cells and epithelial-like MCF-7 cells) spiked into peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) demonstrates selective dielectrophoretic deflection of cancer cells while PBMCs largely follow the central streamline. The platform achieves recovery rates exceeding 98% and a separation purity above 65% within the optimized operating conditions. The proposed system provides a simple label-free approach to separate heterogeneous cell populations and represents a promising tool for microfluidic liquid biopsy enrichment applications.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.