Measuring health literacy from the communal perspective: initial testing of the Information and Support for Health Actions Questionnaire (ISHAQ)
Cheng, C.; Batterham, R.; Elsworth, G. R.; Kloyiam, S.; Vicathai, C.; Wanitkun, N.; Hawkins, M.; Osborne, R. H.
Show abstract
Measuring health literacy is important in addressing health inequity. However, current measures are developed from the individualistic perspective that values personal autonomy and choice. Applying such measures to people from a communal culture that values collective actions may lead to biased responses. To address this gap, a health literacy measure drawing on the communal perspective was developed in Thailand. With the aim to also develop an equitable measure, a grounded approach including strategies to include people with special needs such as people with chronic illness or physical disabilities, blind people and deaf people, was used. Concept mapping workshops were conducted, involving 254 participants including general community members, people with special needs, health professionals and policymakers. The result was a draft questionnaire of 17 hypothesized scales. Psychometric testing involving a survey of 2,228 participants resulted in a 14-scale questionnaire, the Information and Support for Health Actions Questionnaire (ISHAQ). This paper reports on the psychometric testing of the 14-scale ISHAQ and its supplementary scales for people with special needs. Item difficulty, scale reliability, one-factor confirmatory factor analysis using robust maximum likelihood estimator, and measurement invariance across groups with special needs using the alignment method with Bayesian estimation, were evaluated. A total of 2,262 respondents participated in the survey. Six scales achieved excellent model fit while one with reasonable fit and seven scales achieved reasonable to excellent fit following modifications. Supplementary scales also achieved reasonable to excellent model fit. Reliability for all scales were acceptable to good. Measurement invariance was confirmed for eight scales. With strong validity evidence, the ISHAQ is translated into English and ready for implementation. With the potential to be applied in different settings given cultures exist in a continuum, the ISHAQ can be used for health literacy needs assessment to support intervention development to improve health outcomes and equity.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing and validation of a questionnaire for assessment of individual's perceived risk of four major non-communicable diseases in Myanmar 94%
- Global Learning Opportunities Within Social Innovation in Health (GLOWS): Modified Delphi Process to Identify and Pilot Core Competencies for Learning 94%
- The Chinese Assessment of physical literacy:Based on Grounded Theory Paradigm for children in grades 3-6 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Willingness and Perceived ability to pay for Ugandas Proposed National Health Insurance Scheme among Informal Sector workers in Iganga and Mayuge districts, Uganda: A Contingent Valuation Method. 94%
- Implementation research for advancing health equity: design and competency-based assessment of a short-term implementation research training program focused on health equity in global health 93%
- Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experiences of Communities with Lebanon's Model of Care for Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD): A Cross-Sectional Household Survey from Greater Beirut 93%
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 93%
- A conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behavior: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 96%
- How does public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors correlate in relation to COVID-19? A community-based cross-sectional study in Nepal 92%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 93%
- Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Model 93%
- Gender Differences in Health Protective Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: An Empirical Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.