Back

A novel in vitro assay for quantifying endothelial cell and pericyte interactions

Csordas, D. J.; Cucuzzella, L. C.; Kim, J. S.; Peirce, S. M.

2026-08-04 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.03.742618 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveStructural adaptations of capillary networks, through angiogenesis, arterialization, and regression, are implicated in many diseases, and gaining a better understanding of the cell-cell interactions that underpin these adaptations may lead to novel therapeutic discoveries for disease management. Endothelial cells and pericytes are the two cell types that comprise capillary networks. Experimental model systems have been developed to study the dynamic interactions between endothelial cells and pericytes, providing valuable insights into capillary development, cell-to-cell communication, and responses to growth factors and therapeutic agents. MethodsIn this study, we present a novel and simple co-culture system that uses commercially available primary human endothelial cells and pericytes, does not require microfluidic perfusion, and allows simultaneous observation of cell morphologies and interactions over time in 60 samples, enabling high-throughput analysis of multiple culture conditions with replicates. ResultsImage analysis pipelines were created to quantify microvascular adaptations, including one to measure colocalization between endothelial cells and pericytes, capturing dynamic coupling and uncoupling associated with capillary stability, angiogenesis, and regression. We validated the ability of our co-culture system to reproducibly represent the effects of fibrotic and angiogenic activation signals, including an FDA-approved drug, on endothelial cells, pericytes, and their coupling. ConclusionThis novel, high-throughput microvascular screening assay enables quantification of microvascular dynamics in response to disease-relevant stimuli and therapeutics in a repeatable, real-time manner.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.