Parameter-Dependent Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Neural Activation and Evoked Compound Action Potentials
Brucker-Hahn, M. K.; Zander, H. J.; Dinsmoor, D. A.; Lempka, S. F.
Show abstract
ObjectiveSpinal evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) provide a quantitative measure of the neural response during spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and can be leveraged in closed-loop applications to control dose in response to spinal cord movement. However, interpretation of ECAPs recorded in vivo is limited by susceptibility to noise, inter-subject variability, and other confounding factors. As SCS systems evolve and the clinical and research applications of ECAPs expand, it is critical to understand how physiological and technical factors influence ECAP generation and morphology. ApproachWe used a computational modeling framework to systematically investigate the influence of anatomical (e.g., dorsal cerebrospinal fluid (dCSF) thickness), stimulation (e.g., pulse width, waveform shape, stimulation configuration, stimulation frequency), and recording configurations on the neural responses and ECAPs generated during SCS. We employed a hybrid computational modeling approach, coupling finite element method models with multicompartment axon models to simulate neural responses to SCS. Using these models, we characterized the spatiotemporal dynamics of neural recruitment and the resulting ECAP waveforms. Main resultsNeural responses and model ECAPs were strongly influenced by factors, such as dCSF thickness, pulse width, and stimulation waveform shape. Stimulation parameters introduced trade-offs between axonal recruitment thresholds, neural activation selectivity, and ECAP timing and morphology. Notably, similar ECAP amplitudes could obscure differences in the underlying neural recruitment. Complex ECAP morphologies also emerged in response to distinct stimulation paradigms, reflecting changes in the spatiotemporal properties of axonal activation. Additionally, we demonstrate that the selection of recording electrodes can be optimized to enhance recorded ECAP amplitudes. SignificanceOur findings provide a theoretical framework to advance our mechanistic understanding of SCS-induced ECAPs and offer insights into optimization strategies to improve closed-loop SCS therapies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Selectivity, Efficiency, and Dose Equivalence in Deep Brain Stimulation through Pulse Width Tuning and Segmented Electrodes. 95%
- Bridging macroscopic and microscopic modeling of electric field by brain stimulation 93%
- Adaptive current-flow models of ECT: Explaining individual static impedance, dynamic impedance, and brain current delivery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision in Spinal Cord Injury Research: A Novel Electromagnetic Impactor for a Consistent Porcine Model 90%
- Urological benchtop and in silico models validated by human penile tissue inflation tests 89%
- Ultrasound-based optimal parameter estimation improves assessment of calf muscle-tendon interaction during walking 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) triggers dose-dependent homeostatic rewiring in recurrent neuronal networks 92%
- Simulation Insights on the Compound Action Potential in Multifascicular Nerves 92%
- Circuits and mechanisms for TMS-induced corticospinal waves: Connecting sensitivityanalysis to the network graph 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-invasive brain-spine interface: continuous brain control of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation using EEG 92%
- Analysis of the effectiveness of sub-sensory electrical noise stimulation during visuomotor adaptations in different visual feedback conditions 91%
- Changes in Walking Function and Neural Control following Pelvic Cancer Surgery with Reconstruction 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.