Assessing Computational Models for Pharmacogenomic Variant Interpretation
Pucci, F.; Hermans, P.; Tsishyn, M.; Cusato, J.; Rooman, M.
Show abstract
Accurately predicting the effects of pharmacogenomic variants is essential for the development of personalized therapeutic strategies, as genetic variability can influence drug response differently across patients. Here, we assessed several computational approaches using a dataset of pharmacogenomic variants with either clinical annotations or functional characterization by deep mutational scanning, compiled from the literature, with an additional focus on CYP2C9, a clinically relevant drug-metabolizing enzyme. Our results show that, despite recent methodological advances, substantial room for improvement remains. In particular, current methods struggle to distinguish gain-of-function variants associated with increased drug clearance and fast-metabolizer phenotypes from neutral variants, whereas loss-of-function variants that reduce drug clearance are predicted more accurately. The integration of structural and evolutionary information appears to be a key strategy for improving performance, with the coevolution-based StructureDCA method achieving the highest accuracy compared with classical genetic variant-effect predictors and recent deep learning approaches, including the pathogenic-variant predictor AlphaMissense and general protein language model-based methods. Finally, our results indicate that computational models can complement in vitro experiments in clinical variant interpretation, as StructureDCA predictions showed better agreement with clinically annotated phenotypes than large-scale deep mutational scanning data in several cases.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- G-PLIP: Knowledge graph neural network for structure-free protein-ligand bioactivity prediction 92%
- Artemis: Harnessing Knowledge Graphs for Next-Generation Drug Target Prioritization 91%
- Network-based estimation of therapeutic efficacy and adverse reaction potential for prioritisation of anti-cancer drug combinations 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-step multi-omics modelling of drug sensitivity in cancer cell lines to identify driving mechanisms 92%
- Combining explainable machine learning, demographic and multi-omic data to identify precision medicine strategies for inflammatory bowel disease 92%
- Repurposing Therapeutics for COVID-19: Rapid Prediction of Commercially available drugs through Machine Learning and Docking 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.