Back

Menstrual cycle irregularity is a biological determinant of mental health independent of sleep in adolescents

Diogo, F. M. C.; Franca, L. G. S.; Leocadio-Miguel, M. A.; Barbosa, M. N.; Azevedo, C. V. M. d.

2026-08-07 physiology
10.64898/2026.08.03.742466 bioRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTIONSex differences in mental health emerge during adolescence, a period marked by the onset and the establishment of menstrual cycle. However, is rarely examined how menstrual cycle regularity, a marker of hormonal function, modulates mental health. OBJECTIVEto analyse sex differences in mental health symptoms among adolescents considering the menstrual cycle regularity and sleep. METHODSA three-group design (female students with regular cycles/FR, n=77; with irregular cycles/FI, n=59; and male students/M, n=76) in a sample of Brazilian high-school adolescents (n=212; 14-18 years) enrolled in morning and full-time classes was used to test the hypothesis that mental health symptoms follow a graded pattern across these groups. RESULTSMean DASS-21 scores across all groups fell at or above the Mild severity threshold for mental health subscales. GLMs confirmed a monotonic gradient increase in group order (M[-&gt;]FR[-&gt;]FI) which was associated with higher scores on all outcomes (stress {beta}/step=4.33, p<.001; anxiety {beta}/step=4.08, p<.001; and depression {beta}/step=2.34, p=.010; model R{superscript 2}=.16, .13, .08 respectively). However, no differences were observed in sleep duration, social jetlag, chronotype, sleep quality, or sleep-debt. Then, a secondary analysis assessed sex-specific associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and mental health; higher SES was inversely related to stress, anxiety, and depression, being protective only in males (stress Males {beta}=-2.68, p=.011/Females {beta}=0.46, p=.614). CONCLUSIONThese findings support the reframing of menstrual irregularity not only as a reproductive health concern but also as a biological determinant of mental health risk in female adolescents, a vulnerability that sleep disruption and socioeconomic resources do not adequately explain.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.