Back

Seasonal photoperiod cycling reduces inter-individual variability in mu-opioid receptor density in rats

Sun, L.; Liljenback, H.; Virta, J.; Rajander, J.; Helin, S.; Yatkin, E.; Tang, J.; Roivainen, A.

2026-08-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.03.742441 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleThe -opioid receptor (MOR) is widely expressed across tissues and plays crucial roles in pain and stress responses, social behaviour, and immune regulation. Recent evidence indicates seasonal variation in in vivo MOR signalling; for example, short photoperiods are associated with reduced central MOR availability, increased MOR expression in brown adipose tissue (BAT), and strengthened brain-BAT interactions. However, despite this coupling with photoperiod, it remains unclear whether static daylength and dynamically changing photoperiods exert distinct effects, as adaptation to photoperiod transitions may itself induce stress-related modulation of the MOR system. Elucidating how seasonal, stress-related adaptations influence MOR signalling is essential for advancing our understanding of seasonal fluctuations in mood and stress regulation. MethodsWe compared rats housed under seasonal photoperiod cycling with those maintained under constant photoperiod conditions, using ex vivo radioligand binding to directly assess MOR density in central and peripheral tissues. ResultsRats exposed to seasonal photoperiod cycling showed markedly reduced inter-individual variability in MOR density in both the brain (including the cerebellum and striatum) and peripheral tissues (adrenal glands), whereas no tissues exhibited substantially increased variability. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that seasonal photoperiod cycling stabilizes MOR dynamics at the population level, suggesting stress-related synchronization of MOR signalling. The findings deepen our understanding of seasonal effects on endogenous MOR signalling, and further underscore the role of seasonal light variation in modulating mood-related processes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.