Back

A Low-Resource Machine-Learning Framework for Cold-Stress Early Warning in Aquaculture Nursery Ponds Using Manual Temperature Readings

Younos, I. B.; Jahan, N.

2026-08-04 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.01.742243 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cold stress is a recurring risk in tropical and subtropical aquaculture nursery ponds, yet warning tools remain limited where continuous automated sensors are impractical. This study developed a low-resource cold-stress early warning framework using four years (2022-2025) of 6-hourly manual air and pond-water temperature readings from a Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) nursery pond in Cumilla, Bangladesh. Models were fitted on 2022-2023, validated on 2024 for threshold selection, and tested on 2025 as an independent year. Cold stress (daily mean water temperature <20{degrees}C) occurred on 133 days; heat stress (>35{degrees}C) on only 4 days. Air-water coupling was strong overall (r = 0.976) but weakened in winter (r = 0.776) and further within the 18-22{degrees}C boundary zone where cold-stress classification is most sensitive. Solar radiation only marginally increased boundary-zone classification AUC from 0.782 to 0.789. In 6-hour regression, the same-hour-yesterday baseline (MAE = 1.117{degrees}C) nearly matched Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) with MAE of 1.116{degrees}C, cold-zone bias +0.36{degrees}C, and train-test gap 0.02{degrees}C; Random Forest (RF) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) had MAEs of 1.195{degrees}C and 1.244{degrees}C, respectively. For cold-stress classification, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) gave the highest F1 (0.755), while XGBoost provided the more protective operating point, detecting 95 of 108 cold-stress readings at 6-hour lead time (sensitivity = 0.880, F1 = 0.739). XGBoost warning skill extended to 12, 18, and 24-hour lead times, with F1 scores of 0.722, 0.646, and 0.704, respectively. The framework converts routine manual thermometer readings into short-lead cold-stress alerts for nursery management decisions. Multi-pond validation is needed before deployment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.