Efficacy of a long lasting ivermectin formulation against malaria vectors in a semi-field trial in Bapla, Southwest of Burkina Faso
OUEDRAOGO, C. O. W.; SOME, F. A.; BENETEAU, S.; SOUGUE, E.; PORCIANI, A.; SOMA, D. D.; MOIROUX, N.; DAH, S. R.; POODA, S. H.; SAGNA, A. B.; PENNETIER, C.; ZELA, L.; NDIAYE, M.; LE LAMER-DECHAMPS, S.; NIANG, E. H. A.; MOULINE, K.; DABIRE, R. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundIvermectin, a widely used endectocide with activity against Anopheles (An) mosquitoes, has emerged as a promising complementary tool for malaria vector control. However, currently approved oral formulations provide only short-lived plasma concentrations at mosquitocidal levels, thereby limiting their operational impact. To overcome this limitation, a long-acting injectable formulation based on ivermectin and BEPO technology (mdc-STM-001) was selected through laboratory screening using mosquito colonies. This formulation demonstrated mosquitocidal efficacy meeting WHO criteria, with a hazard ratio (HR) >4 maintained for at least two months. The present study aims to further characterize the efficacy of ivermectin under robust field conditions and to expand susceptibility assessments to wild Anopheles populations representing different species and vectorial status. Ivermectin was tested in cattle at two doses under field conditions using experimental huts and tent traps. Plasma drug levels were also monitored to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of ivermectin. MethodsThirty-six calves were involved in the study and allocated to three groups (n = 12 per group). The mdc-STM-1.0 group received a single subcutaneous injection of the long-acting ivermectin formulation mdc-STM-001 at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg; the mdc-STM-1.5 group received the same formulation at 1.5 mg/kg and the third group served as controls. Using a three-arm design, cattle from each treatment group were simultaneously exposed to mosquitoes in experimental huts and tent traps, following a Greco-Latin Square rotation to minimize positional confounding factors. Pharmacokinetic data were collected to assess ivermectin release from the subcutaneous depot. Correlations between plasma ivermectin concentrations and mosquito mortality were explored, and survival analysis including Kaplan-Meier and cox proportional hazards models were performed to assess the effect of treatment on mosquito survival. ResultsThe mdc-STM-001 formulation was well tolerated and produced sustained, dose-dependent plasma ivermectin concentrations, with detectable levels maintained for more than 90 days after a single administration. Both doses induced strong mosquitocidal activity against wild Anopheles, with hazard ratios reaching 8.03 and 16.47 for the 1.0 and 1.5 mg/kg doses, respectively. An. funestus and An. rufipes were the most susceptible species (LC50: 5.1-6.9 ng/mL) exhibiting prolonged LC50 coverage (>75 days), whereas An. coustani was less susceptible (LC50: 12.4-19.2 ng/mL) resulting in a shorter duration of effective coverage (17-41 days). ConclusionsTaken together, our results revealed the potential of the mdc-STM-001 long-acting ivermectin formulation as an effective endectocide against residual malaria transmission by primary and secondary vectors and establish evidence basis to support its progression to early-phase clinical trials in humans.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative palatability of orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) of Praziquantel (L-PZQ and Rac-PZQ) versus current PZQ tablet in African children: a randomized, single-blind, crossover study 95%
- Novel Insights into Malaria Vector Surveillance in Madagascar Using a Quadrant Enabled Screen Trap (QUEST) and Bloodmeal Detection Assay for Regional Transmission (BLOODART) 95%
- Effect of a single dose of 8 mg moxidectin or 150 µg/kg ivermectin on O. volvulus skin microfilariae in a randomized trial: Differences between areas in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia and Ghana and impact of intensity of infection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early-evening biting by Anopheles stephensi in Southern Ethiopia: A Challenge for Bed Net Use as Vector Control in Africa 95%
- Field efficacy of guppies and pyriproxyfen (Sumilarv(R) 2MR) combined with community engagement on dengue vectors in Cambodia: a randomized controlled trial 94%
- Efficacy of a spatial repellent for control of malaria in Indonesia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of wall type, delayed mortality and mosquito age on the residual efficacy of a clothianidin-based indoor residual spray formulation (SumiShieldTM 50WG) in southern Mozambique 95%
- Community perceptions and acceptance of ivermectin for malaria control on Sumba Island, Indonesia 95%
- Insecticide resistance status of indoor and outdoor resting malaria vectors in a highland and lowland site in Western Kenya 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in Northern Papua and Jambi, Indonesia 95%
- Characterizing the molecular and metabolic mechanisms of insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Faranah, Guinea 95%
- Infection of highly insecticide-resistant malaria vector Anopheles coluzzii with an environmentally friendly entomopathogenic bacteria Chromobacterium violaceum reduces its survival, blood feeding propensity and fecundity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can dual active ingredient Interceptor G2 insecticide treated net (ITN) replace indoor residual spraying (IRS) efficiently; A case study in Sakassou, Cote d'Ivoire 96%
- Differential contribution of Anopheles coustani and Anopheles arabiensis to the transmission of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in two neighboring villages of Madagascar 94%
- A systematic review assessing the potential for release of vector species from competition following insecticide-based population suppression of Anopheles species in Africa 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.