A functional comparison of readthrough agent ELX-02 across a wide range of nonsense CFTR variants
Destoop, M.; Ramalho, A. S.; Silva, I. A. L.; Vonk, A. M.; Suen, S.; Bierlaagh, M.; Boj, S. F.; Vries, R. G. J.; Beekman, J. M.; de Boeck, K.; van der Ent, C. K.; Amaral, M. D.; Vermeulen, F.; Spelier, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundNonsense variants in CFTR account for ~10% of cystic fibrosis (CF) variants and cannot be treated with approved CFTR modulators. Translational readthrough agents such as ELX-02 offer a potential therapeutic strategy, but clinical trials evaluated mainly in G542X CFTR nonsense variant and underlined limited efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate ELX-02-mediated CFTR rescue across a broad range of nonsense variants using patient-derived intestinal organoids (PDIOs) to define variant-specific determinants of readthrough efficacy and assess its potential across a genetically diverse CF population. MethodThe ex vivo response to ELX-02 was assessed in 206 PDIOs carrying heterogeneous nonsense variants. CFTR function was quantified using forskolin-induced swelling (FIS) assay after 48-hour exposure to ELX-02. Responses were analysed by genotype and stop codon identity, with secondary validation performed in a selected subset of PDIOs (n = 60). ResultsELX-02-mediated CFTR rescue varied markedly, ranging from responses approaching those observed with approved CFTR modulators (LUM/IVA) to responses at or below detection limit. Overall, maximal responses were modest and at the lower end of the functional range for CFTR modulators. Rescue was dose-dependent and higher in PDIOs carrying two nonsense variants when compared with PDIOs carrying a single nonsense variant combined with a residual or minimal function variant. Nonsense variants in nucleotide-binding domain 1, including G542X, S466X, G550X and R553X, showed relatively higher responsiveness. ConclusionELX-02 induces limited and highly heterogeneous CFTR rescue across nonsense variants. PDIO-based functional screening provides a framework to guide patient selection and stratification for future readthrough therapy trials.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- FDA-Approved Drug Screening in Patient-Derived Organoids Demonstrates Potential of Drug Repurposing for Rare Cystic Fibrosis Genotypes 95%
- Reduction in abdominal symptoms (CFAbd-Score), faecal M2-pyruvate-kinase and Calprotectin over one year of treatment with Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in people with CF aged ≥12 years – The RECOVER study 93%
- Antisense oligonucleotide-based drug development for Cystic Fibrosis patients carrying the 3849+10kb C-to-T splicing mutation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- High-Throughput Functional Assay in Cystic Fibrosis Patient-Derived Organoids Allows Drug Repurposing 93%
- Donor-derived airway ALI model for high-throughput screening of antiviral combinations with concurrent analysis of antiviral efficacy and epithelial toxicity using ciliR 89%
- Development and validation of a parent proxy bronchiectasis child quality of life instrument: The BC-QoL 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomised Controlled Trial of Intravenous Nafamostat Mesylate in COVID pneumonitis: Phase 1b/2a Experimental Study to Investigate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 88%
- Loss-of-function variants in the KCNQ5 gene are associated with genetic generalized epilepsies 88%
- Predicting the functional effects of voltage-gated potassium channel missense variants with multi-task learning 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking AlphaMissense Pathogenicity Predictions Against Cystic Fibrosis Variants 93%
- Application of pharmacogenomics and bioinformatics to exemplify the utility of human ex vivo organoculture models in the field of precision medicine. 90%
- Modeling Cystic Fibrosis Patient Prognosis: Nomograms To Predict Lung Transplantation And Survival Prior To Highly Effective Modulator Therapy 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.